logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2017.01.12 2016고단209
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has been in an internal relationship with the victim D while operating the cel in the former Jin-gun, Nam-gun, and the victim E is a spouse under the law of the victim D.

1. On November 2, 2016, at around 23:00 on November 2, 2016, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) the victim D entering the inner room in which the victim D resides, and taking a bath in a large amount; (b) the victim D’s breath with double hand, and flaping the window installed therein; and (c) the Defendant removed the window installed therein.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence, and interfered with the victim's accommodation business by force.

2. On November 7, 2016, around 09:10, the Defendant entered the boiler room located on the rooftop of the instant cel through the stoke door on the ground that the victim D was avoided contact by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd on the building managed by the damaged person.

3. On November 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) went to the instant cel on the ground that the victim D was free contact with the Defendant; (b) went to the instant cel on the ground that the victim D was going to the said cel on the ground of avoiding contact; and (c) got the victim E (the 46-year-old) to have the victim E (the her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her husband her; and (d) got off the victim E’s left hand in order to shut down the windows of the said cel on the drinking; and (e) continued to throw the said windows away from the said windows.

As a result, the Defendant up to two weeks of medical treatment to the victim E, and obstructed the victim’s accommodation business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Each E statement;

1. Taking photographs at the scene of the case, photographs of victims E/grams, and capturing each video file;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow