Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for larceny in support of the care center for larceny on January 6, 2017. On the 14th of the same month, the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month, and is currently under the suspended sentence period. Around April 14, 2017, the Seoul Central District Court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for larceny and has a total of 11 criminal punishment records.

[2] On March 13, 2017, from around 12:36 to around 13:28 of the same day, the Defendant entered the Defendant’s money and valuables in the sum of KRW 64,500,000, total market price of KRW 166,00,000, which is favorable for the market price of KRW 15,00,000, displayed in the above victim and store employees by taking advantage of the gapss of the above victim and store employees, as well as KRW 64,50,000, total market price of KRW 64,50,000, including 1,000,000, 13,500, from around May 6, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each written statement of E, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, and T;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history and report on investigation (attaching sentence, etc.);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are punished several times for the same crime, is that the defendant was punished for the same crime. Furthermore, in light of the fact that the defendant was sentenced to the suspended sentence due to larceny and continues to commit the larceny of this case even during the current suspended sentence period, and that the criminal liability is heavy.

I would like to say.

However, it is against the defendant and is receiving medical treatment for impulse adjustment disorder, etc.