A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 04:05 on May 5, 2020, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s marina business by force by avoiding disturbance over about 17 minutes, such as “the fluor who died of satise”, “the satise satise satise”, “the satise satise satise”, and “the satise satise satise satise satise”, and satise satise satise satise satisfs on the floor.

2. Intimidation: (a) at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1), the Defendant: (b) told the victim who escaped from the Defendant to the damaged toilet (or 37 years of age) that “the victim was a bit of a governance misunderstanding, bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a victim.

3. On the same day as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for charges of interference with the above duties, etc. by the chief F of the police box affiliated with the police box of the Jeonnam Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of 112 around 04:30 on the same day.

피고인은 같은 날 04:39경 여수시 G에 있는 E파출소 사무실 내에서 내부 업무 공간으로 진입하려고 하는 등 소란을 피우다가 위 E파출소에서 상황근무를 하고 있던 순경 H으로부터 제지를 당하자, 위 H에게 “이 짭새새끼야, 씨발놈의 새끼야, 야 이 개새끼야”라고 욕설을 하고, 위 H의 오른쪽 무릎 부위를 발로 1회 걷어 차 폭행하였다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention and situation service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A written statement of C and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (referring to the analysis of dynamic image data set up in the D Magaz area);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, the applicable provision for criminal facts, the choice of punishment (a point of interference with business), and Article 316 of the Criminal Act.