Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for the defendant A from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, two years shall apply.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: (a) around 02:00 on May 16, 2018, at the “E sing shop located in Kimhae-si,” Defendant A’s “E sing shop.”

“The victim was asked questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the Victim G (26) who was a policeman belonging to the F District of the Police Station in the Kim Sea, who was called up after receiving a report 112, and was heard by H and police officers I, and J, etc., the owner of the said main shop in the Kim Sea, and the victim “the victim was sexually insultingd by fluoring the fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, and fluoring the fluor in a large sound.”

2. The Defendants jointly committed the crime at around 02:14 May 16, 2018: (a) paid the drinking value from the police officer I (35 years) belonging to the said district guard, and patrolmen G (26 years) who called out after receiving the said report, but were demanded to return home, but police officers were not able to go home on the ground that they did not resolve the drinking value even if they claimed excessive drinking value.

Defendant

B On the top of the above parking point, on the 31st patrol car (K), the police officer I and G was parked in the 31st patrol car (K), and the police officer I and G was able to open a door and close the door, and the defendant A Da to the police officer I and S. G was able to do so.

If a driver scar handles this ceremony, he can write off his clothes by using an article.

Whether it is not easy or not.

If it is not treated fairly or fairly.

Norhman shall have a limited number of people.

The purpose of this study was to prevent the question by threatening high sound.

Defendant

B, in order to start the patrol (M) of the patrol L, which was stopped on the part of the said patrol car, the said patrol car was obstructed in the future, and during that period, the Defendant A obstructed the operation of the said car in front of the patrol car of the 31st century, while the Defendant A obstructed the operation of the said car in front of the patrol car of the 31st century, which was boarded by G police officers.

Since then, Defendant B did not proceed with the patrol car No. 32, but reported 119 in a false manner, and Defendant B opened a vehicle door and took the front of the vehicle, and her hand by using the window of the vehicle.