Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2017, the Defendant took a taxi operated by C in front of the Suwon Station on April 23:47, 2017, and took a bath to the above taxi engineer while under the influence of alcohol, and frank the fright, and reported 112 to the fright of the frighton D in front of the Suwon Station. The police officers belonging to the police station E box of the Suwon Police Station in charge of receiving the above report were dispatched to the scene.

On April 3, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as above at D, on the street in front of Suwon-si, who received a report, listened to the details of the report, sent a taxi engineer, and recommended the Defendant to return home, and caused the Defendant to do so, the Defendant would have the shoulder F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of the police station who tried to board the patrol (net 82) while carrying the horse F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of the police station, and even if the F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of F of the police station, the Defendant continued to put the f of the police station at this place, and continued to put the f of F of F

“Abrupt the shoulder of the horse F, which is intended to take a bath and to board the patrol vehicle, and obstructed the operation of the patrol vehicle by having the horse F to board the patrol vehicle, such as the defect of the horse F to have the seat on board the patrol vehicle, and putting the driver’s seat on it.

The Defendant continued to restrain the Defendant to move the patrol car operated by G and Assistant F, who belongs to the said patrol box, and obstructed the operation of the patrol vehicle by placing the shoulder part of G, putting the shoulder part of the said patrol boat into the arms, putting the arms in the arms, putting the other patrol vehicle to move by a slope H, and obstructing the operation of the patrol vehicle by keeping the front of the patrol vehicle in his body.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the 112 reported dispatch duty by each police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, on-site and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Punishment;