logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.05.25 2016고합54
살인미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall be a public official of Grade VII in administrative service belonging to the local government, who is in charge of DNA viewing and administrative support.

The defendant, who is a public official belonging to the ordinary D viewing, had often been able to look at two children of 8 and 5 times in the wind that the defendant's wife goes to work at the weekend or attend a church event, and the wife had been able to go to the wife due to the problem of late returning home after the ceremony. In addition, the defendant did not feel any particular sight while working at the workplace.

On the other hand, around February 2016, the smallest punishment of the Defendant, who was frighten and good, was accompanied by a vehicle in Busan and died in a traffic accident. The Defendant dealt with a small funeral problem, insurance money problem, etc. on behalf of his family. In the course of contact with the president, insurance company employees, etc. of the company where a small punishment was served due to insurance money, the Defendant heard the phrase “to claim for damages to a bereaved family member of the company who caused the death of the company,” or heard the phrase “to be able to receive insurance money” from the insurance company’s employees, the Defendant sawd a great loss and fright in the company’s attitude on the part of the insurance company’s employees about the death of a small punishment. After hearing from the Defendant’s mother, she also frighted her mother as “after receiving KRW 50 million from the company.”

In addition, on February 29, 2016 and March 20, 2016, the Defendant was unable to smoothly perform duties in the workplace due to hospital treatment. In addition, on February 29, 2016, and on March 20, 2016, the Defendant was absent from school due to the absence from school to the mixed emergency room in the new wall.

As above, the Defendant is an in-house issue such as the relation with the wife, the impulse to the Aggravated Death of a small amount of punishment, stress arising from the payment of insurance money after the death of a small amount of punishment, and an in-depth union for the president of the above company and employees of the insurance company involved.

arrow