All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Defendants A and B of the facts charged in the instant case are the simple couple of the married couple, and Defendants C are their daughters.

At the time of the outbreak of the foot-and-help that occurred in January 201, the Defendants were not asked about 5,00 pigs infected by the foot-and-help station at the F farm run by Defendant C at the time of the outbreak of the foot-and-help station, and instead asked about 5,00 heads of the F farm run by Defendant A and his brothers and sisters at the farm, but asked the Defendant A and six brothers and sisters to resist the burial of the burial in G, and I, who is a public official in this process, was fluent with B’s arms.

1. Defendants A and C conspired on September 7, 2013, at the Gangnam-gu Seoul J and the office of Defendant C on September 7, 2013, at the Gangnam-gu Seoul J and 5 Dong 505, Defendant C’s Internet homepage bulletin board “I will come to the H and public officials I will come to and go to the wife,” and the wife would not occur, and 4 to 5 older older persons who were older than 71.

By posting a letter of ‘A', the reputation of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out facts through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim I, as well as by openly pointing out facts through an information and communications network, and by openly pointing out facts in the Internet’s bulletin board for viewing and the free speech platform of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, and by publicly pointing out facts on the Internet.

2. Defendant C

A. Defamation 1) The Defendant, on November 18, 2013, at the delivery prior to domination of the PP and his employee, who was in the Scar-dong Hong-dong on May 18, 2013, did not assault the victim’s female viewing H and his employee, but, even though there was no assault by the victim’s female members, “h and senior citizens’ assault is insufficient.”

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by sound invasion.”

2) On December 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was transferred in front of the Hongmun District District of Hongmun-dong, Hongmun-dong, Hongmun-dong, Hongmun-dong, and even though there was no fact that the victim female viewing H and his employees had inflicted mine; (b) the Defendant was able to do so at a place where a large number of persons in a name-free box are located.