logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.02 2017고정1656
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who corrects the clerical error of “E” in the written indictment written in the social network services C. The Defendant is a person who uses the document.

1. Definite Defendant: (a) posted the victim G in his/her account on March 29, 2013, at around 14:30 on April 4, 2017, in the Defendant’s dwelling located in Sungnam City F, 3506 dong 209, Defendant’s smartphone; and (b) published the victim G in his/her account in around 23:38.

빕스가 서 드세용~~ 진짜 맛있어요

Pursuant to the aforesaid method, the Defendant’s residence around April 15, 2017: (a) written comments stating “the fluorial fluorries, fluor, fluor, fluor,” written on March 23, 2013; (b) around 04:41, 201; and (c) on March 23, 2013, written and posted in his/her account by the victim at around 16:57, 201.

3.2. The same sound and neons as the French flag in the letter "......."

Along with this, the author openly insultings the victim by writing the comments of the “lowest year”.

2. No person who violates the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. shall defame another person by openly pointing out false facts through an information and communications network with intent to defame another person;

On April 7, 2017, around 10:45, the Defendant posted a report prepared by the Victim G in his/her account on March 30, 2013, in the same manner as Paragraph 1, at the Defendant’s residence, on March 30, 2013.

” 라는 글에 “ 애들 가정 델구가”, “ 나 혼자 살 테니”, “ 나 혼자는 어 떳 게 살든 살 테니 니가 키워”, “ 둘 다 미성년 자니까” 라는 댓 글을 작성하고, 2017. 4. 15. 20:54 경 피고인의 주거지에서 제 1 항 기재와 같은 방법으로 피해자가 2014. 5. 18. 14:57 경 C에 작성 게시한 “ 영화보고 쇼핑하고 먹는 점심 치즈 불닭과 치즈 삼겹살 생각의 외로 맛 나~~ 맛 나~~ ㅋㅋ” 라는 글에, “ 시집 보네

A person who has suffered damage with the intention of slandering the victim by writing out a statement that "the fluence is not the fluence, not the fluence," which is the fluence of the fluence and the fluence of the fluence."

arrow