The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact misunderstanding: The judgment of the court below which judged otherwise although the defendant did not have the victim's damage as soon as possible, it is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Sentencing: The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (the amount of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts. ① The defendant alleged that the damaged party's son and the victim's son were faced with the defendant's right as soon as possible during the course of unilaterally assaulting the defendant. However, the victim's son and the son's son and the son's son were difficult to see that the above son's son and the son's son were faced with the defendant's son's son's son (29 pages of evidence record). ② If the defendant's son's son's son and the son's son's son were the victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

In full view of the consistent statements, the judgment of the court below that the defendant promptly caused the victim's damages, etc. is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law by mistake of facts, such as the defendant's assertion.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.