The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant did not have the victim's damages with the glass cup, etc., and only caused the victim's damages on his/her own glass.

The victim's statement that corresponds to the facts charged is not reliable due to lack of consistency, and witness I's statement is not reliable because it is inconsistent with CCTV images.

B. The sentence of the lower court (two years of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant’s misunderstanding of facts can be sufficiently recognized, as the Defendant’s misunderstanding of the victim’s damages, etc. by the so-called “self-feassive World Cup” is without merit.

① The victim stated consistently at occasional agencies and the court of the court below that “the Defendant took the Defendant’s hand, etc. in favor of him,” and I, who was witness, also at the investigative agency and the court of the court of the court below, consistently stated that “the Defendant taken the Defendant’s hand,” as the chief executive officer of the main point where the instant case occurred.

② At the time of the instant case, the fact that there was a shoulder fluor at the scene is confirmed by a fluor’s photo taken by the police, and according to the photograph taken by the victim at the time by the police, the victim’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s body

③ A thorough examination of CCTV images contained in the USB (108 pages of evidence records), pointing out by the Defendant, the victim suffered injury due to reasons other than the Defendant’s injury.

no such circumstances may be found.

In addition, the victim was a son, etc. who was suffering from the victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

see it.