The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the victim did not face the defendant's vehicle driving and did not have any injury.

Nevertheless, the lower court convicted the Defendant of a traffic accident report (written investigation) prepared in accordance with the victim’s statement and the above statement, and made it reliable, and without checking the victim’s upper body photograph taken by F, the investigating police officer, or hearing F’s statement.

The court below erred by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations.

2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

It is difficult to believe that the statements of the victim are inconsistent and difficult to understand as follows.

On the part of the injury, the victim was faced with the left hand on the backer of the driver's vehicle in the course of investigation.

Although the court of the court below stated that the prosecutor's main examination is against the left part, such as the left hand hand, etc.

진술하다가 (E 녹취서 3 쪽) 변호인의 반대신문에 대해서는 손등이 아니라 손날 부위라고 진술을 번복하였다 (E 녹취서 11 쪽). 피해자는 경찰 조사과정에서 조사 경찰관 F에게 피고인 운전 차량에 부딪혀 빨갛게 변한 부분을 보여주었다고

진술하였는데 (E 녹취서 13 쪽), F은 당 심에서 피해자가 보여준 상해 부위가 빨갛게 되어 있었는 지에 대해서는 기억이 나지 않는다면 서도 특별히 눈에 보이는 흔적이나 외상은 없었다는 취지로 증언하여 (F 녹취서 5 쪽) 피해 자의 위 진술과 부합하지 않는다.

According to the statement by the unanimous opinion of the defendant and the victim, the victim was faced with the defendant in the vehicle until he left the scene after the defendant left the vehicle.