logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.09.26 2014고단5276
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:03 on January 9, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) stated that “D”, which is located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, hereinafter “D”), sent a bath to an employee F to an employee of his/her employees, and that “A guest G (neither 27 years of age, nor she would see that he/she would be able to take a meal with multiple meals, and that he/she would be able to take a meal,” and as a result, he/she spits the victim’s face twice, spits the brine of the victim H (27 years of age) with his/her hand, booms his/her head, and her head, who was an employee of the Defendant, was able to take part in the remaining part of the victim’s 1, 27 years of age, and 1, 27 years of age.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the Victim G and H in conjunction with I, and inflicted on the victim J about two weeks of treatment, such as the impairment of sacrifies, which requires two weeks of treatment.

2. At around 00:40 on January 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed that there was a dispute as above in front of the said D’s street; (b) the background leading up to the KJ 112, and the background leading up to the said E, the Defendant: (c) opened the back of the defective patrol vehicle to go to the patrol vehicle; and (d) brought the said L, etc. into E; (b) expressed the said L, etc.’s desire to read “Isle police officers Chewing sprinks to go to the night”; and (c) caused the said L, etc. to have the Defendant go to go to the patrol vehicle, the said L, etc. assaulted the Defendant on several occasions, and assaulted the Defendant’s right-hand kne on one occasion.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported L and M 112 as a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of the police officer regarding I;

1. Each police protocol of statement of M, L, and G;

1. Written statements of J, G and H;

1. Photographs;

arrow