A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 4059"

1. Crimes related to DNA real estate in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government;

A. On April 6, 2013, the Defendant forged private documents and forged private documents 1) on the paper of the real estate lease contract using the verification color pen on the paper of the real estate lease contract at a place where it is not possible to forge the private document, stating that “Seoul Metropolitan Government Do 13.6 square meters” and “Seoul Metropolitan Government Do 13.6 square meters” in the area column, “sale0 million won” in the pre-paid gold column, and “F, G, and H” on the date of preparation, and affixed the name and seal on the paper of the pre-paid box.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the real estate lease agreement in F, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2) On September 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) exercised the aforementioned investigation document as if he/she were an employee K with knowledge of the forgery in order to obtain a final date at the J community service center located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul; and (b) exercised the forged real estate lease contract as if he/she was a document that was duly formed with the conclusion of the contract; and (c) on November 11, 2013, in order to borrow money as security for the claim for the return of the deposit from the “M multilateral” located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City L, with a view to borrowing money as security for the claim for the return of the deposit, the Defendant exercised the forged real estate lease contract with N who was unaware of the forgery as if it

B. On November 11, 2013, the Defendant presented a forged real estate lease agreement with the victim N as described in the above paragraph (a)-1) from “M multilateral bank” located in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City L, and the Defendant is under residence by leasing the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Eunpyeong E head from the lessor F to the deposit amount of KRW 80 million.

In order to transfer a claim for the repayment of a deposit to a lessor, it was false to request a lessor to borrow money as security.

However, in fact, the Defendant entered into a lease contract with the lessor F and the 450,000 won in a monthly rent, and did not enter into a lease contract with the 80,000 won in a deposit. Therefore, the victim is the victim.