1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the annex sheet;

(b) From April 22, 2018, KRW 2,380,00 and KRW 2,00.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 3, 2012, the Plaintiff (formerly: Dongjin-Tex Co., Ltd.) entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant as follows with respect to the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”).

For use: Deposit money from September 11, 2012 to September 21, 2014: 20 million won per month: India and restoration to the original state: The defendant shall, when the lease contract of this case is terminated due to the expiration of the contract period of this case, take the possession thereof out by the date of termination of the contract, and deliver the leased object owned by the plaintiff to the plaintiff by restoring it to the original state.

(1) If the Defendant violated the above provision, the amount equivalent to twice the ordinary rent shall be paid to the Plaintiff, calculated by the period from the date following the expiration date of the contract to the date of delivery or restoration to the original state.

(Article 15(2) of the instant lease agreement: The refund of the rental deposit cannot be claimed to the Plaintiff unless the instant lease agreement is terminated, and the Defendant completed all the obligations under the instant lease agreement.

(former part of Article 16 of the instant lease agreement).

On September 17, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant changed the term of lease and the rent under the instant lease only as follows, and the remaining conditions were the same and renewed.

The lease period: 1.7 million won per month from September 22, 2014 to September 21, 2016:

C. Around September 21, 2016, the Plaintiff extended the rental period from September 22, 2016 to September 21, 2017, and renewed the instant lease agreement under the same conditions as the remainder.

On July 19, 2017, between six months and one month prior to the expiration date of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the refusal to renew the instant lease agreement.