logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.04.12 2016나24086
퇴직금지급청구
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for partial revision of the judgment of the first instance as follows.

Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court is "each entry of evidence Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 8 of the A" in Part 8 of the judgment of the first instance court as "each entry of evidence Nos. 3, 4, 5, 8, and 11 of the A".

On the ground that there is only 1) Nos. 4-10 of the judgment of the first instance court No. 5, 4-10 of the judgment “. . . . 1” was written only by the following: “ 1) ; 12, 13, and 14, it is difficult to view the provisional payment that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff as part of wages, including retirement benefits; and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise. Rather, in full view of the evidence No. 8 (the authenticity of the provisional payment, as follows), No. 17, 18 of the evidence No. 17, and the testimony of witness D of the first instance court, the above payment certificate is limited to the fact that the Defendant paid a certain amount at the Plaintiff’s request, and there is no indication that the Defendant would pay as part of the wages; 2) ; 3) 3) 4-10 of the decision of the first instance court, among the opinions of the Defendant, only some of the employees, including the Plaintiff, received the provisional payment from the Defendant.

On the sixth side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the third side of the judgment shall be a witness D.

arrow