1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

On May 8, 1997, this Court against the plaintiff of the 000 Enterprise Corporation.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. As to whether the authenticity of evidence No. 15 submitted by the plaintiff at the trial of the court of first instance is established or not, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for additional determination under Paragraph 3, and thus, it is determined to accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The modified part;

(1) Following the first instance court’s ruling No. 5, No. 3, the phrase “not having been able to be issued” added to the phrase “n.e., the bill of this case is concurrently issued.”

B. Part V of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same promissory note, and the phrase “the same promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”)” is deemed to read “the same promissory note” as “the instant promissory note.”

(c) in Part 5 of the first instance judgment, the term “I” in Part 7 shall be read as “I and the first instance court witness M.

Following the first instance judgment of the first instance court’s 6th page, the following is added: “No evidence exists to acknowledge the authenticity of the original of the certificate of payment of the steel materials (Evidence A No. 15) and no evidence exists to acknowledge the authenticity of the original, and the content also is paid in lieu of a part of the bill’s claim amounting to KRW 364,523,480, and it does not specify that the bill’s claim was paid in lieu of a substitute.”

(e)No. 6 of the first instance court ruling “13” is “13 and 15 evidence”; and “Witness H and I” is respectively “Witness H, I, Party M and Signatory”;

F. On the 6th judgment of the first instance court, the Plaintiff’s payment in lieu of the Plaintiff is deemed to read “payment in lieu of the Plaintiff’s obligation pursuant to the instant judgment.”

G. The following changes are made to the part stated in the letter of conduct 5 to 7 of the judgment of the first instance.

“(B) Furthermore, whether reimbursement is made in accordance with the distribution procedure.