beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of five million won at the Busan District Court for fraud, etc. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant filed a petition for review on the above judgment on April 15, 2015, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of five million won on July 15, 2015. The above judgment became final and conclusive on July 23, 2015.
1. On July 2012, the Defendant involved in the crime B: (a) within the SK Telecom Agent’s agency located on the second floor of SK Telecom located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) without authority, entered “B”, “F” and “B” in the column for signature in the column for the application for mobile phone entrance with the intent to exercise a driver’s license obtained from B; (c) signed the name of B in the next page; and (d) submitted three copies (H, I, and J) of the application for mobile phone entry in the victim’s name, which is a private document on rights and obligations; and (c) subsequently, submitted three copies of the application for mobile phone entry in the SK Telecom to the SK Telecom.
2. K-related crimes;
A. On November 28, 2012, the Defendant phoneed L, an employee of the Ulsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., which was known to the Defendant, to the former place of work at a closed place, and called “one copy of the new contract for mobile phone service in lieu of two copies of the mobile phone service contract,” and sent to L the image files of the resident registration certificate in the name of the victim K, which was stored in a mobile phone with a person in an irregular situation.
In addition, the Defendant had L, without knowledge of the fact, write “K” in the “K’s address column,” and sign the “K” in the signature and seal column, using a tamp-type click-type M 301” and the “K” on the new contract form for the service kept in the said mobile phone agency.
Accordingly, the defendant is a service in the name of K, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.