1. On January 7, 2015, between B and the Defendant, at the front of the 188 119 Safety Center shooting distance, the 14:18 Masung-si, Sungsung-si, B and the Defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 9, 2014, the Plaintiff is an insurer that entered into an insurance contract with respect to CM520 automobiles (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s automobiles”) as indicated in the attached Form, and the Defendant is the owner of DM 100 Orala (hereinafter “Defendant Orala”).

B. On January 7, 2015, around 14:00 on January 7, 2015, the traffic accident circumstance (attached Form No. 1) B (see, e.g., “accident site map”) (see, e., attached Form No. 1) (B) driven the Plaintiff’s car and was proceeding using one lane among the three lanes in the KTTT Tri-distance gate from the KTri-distance gate, and the Defendant was driving the Defendant Oraba and followed the Plaintiff’s car immediately behind the Plaintiff’s car.

(2) B came to the vicinity of the 14:18th day, around 119:00 Sasty.

In the above place, the left or left-hand turn turn turn turn was added to the left side of the first line as stated in the attached Form “the accident scene map.” However, B attempted to make an internship in the part that did not reach the direction, etc. but entered the said or left-hand turn turn lane, and immediately tried to make an internship in the part that did not reach the permissible section of the U.S.ton.

(3) However, the defendant, who was behind the plaintiff's vehicle immediately, thought that the plaintiff would not turn on the direction direction, etc., entered the above left-hand or internship road. The plaintiff entered the vehicle into the above left-hand or internship road, and left-hand or left-hand turn, and left-hand turn the course of the plaintiff's vehicle rapidly to the left-hand side of the plaintiff's right-hand side, but the defendant Orab did not avoid, but went beyond the front left-hand side part of the plaintiff's vehicle with the front right-hand side and the opposite side part.

(4) In the instant accident, the Defendant sustained injuries that require two weeks’ medical treatment, and Defendant Oral Ba had damaged KRW 1,165,000 at its repair cost.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements and images, and the purport of the whole pleadings, as a whole, of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 8, 9

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s instant traffic accident is the Plaintiff’s car.