1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,735,580 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from November 1, 2013 to May 1, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 9, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into an automobile insurance contract with C vehicles owned by B, and included a non-insurance special agreement for injury security by a non-insurance motor vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). B.

On February 22, 2013, around 06:50, the Defendant operated DOba (hereinafter “Defendant”) in front of the Agricultural Cooperative near the Samsung Heavy Industries, the COba (hereinafter “Defendant”) and was running from the front door of the Samsung Heavy Industries to the rear door. However, the Defendant did not avoid moving back to the left without turning the direction, etc. on the left side, and did not turn down the left side portion of the Plaintiff’s left side to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

C. Along with the above shock, B suffered from the pressure pressure pressure of the 12 chest C, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

The plaintiff paid 40,885,580 won in total to B with medical expenses and agreed amount. The plaintiff was paid 16,150,000 won in total from the Dong Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., the insurance company of the defendant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 10, Gap evidence 11-1-6, Eul evidence 1 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above fact of recognition of the liability for damages, the defendant is liable for compensating for damages arising therefrom, since he neglected his duty of care as the driver of the defendant vehicle, resulting in the instant accident.

However, it is reasonable to limit the defendant's liability to 70% in the accident of this case in the sense that the defendant's liability is limited to 70% in the accident of this case in that the driver did not check whether there is a vehicle driving behind the Do.

B. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in evidence Nos. 11-1 to 6 of the amount of damages claim No. 2,885,580 won, and temporary closure damage.