logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.05 2018가단500504
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of CT 100 Oral Ba (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oral Ba”), and Defendant B is the owner of DST 520 Car (hereinafter “Defendant’s automobile”), and Defendant MM 520 insurance company is the insurer who entered into an insurance contract with Defendant B with respect to the Defendant’s automobile.

B. Around 14:00 on January 7, 2015, Defendant B driven the Defendant’s car, and driven it on the BTT Tri-si-si-ro, using one-lane of the three-lanes from the KT TTri-siside to the KTTri-si gate, and the Plaintiff was driving the Plaintiff Oraba, thereby proceeding immediately following the Defendant’s car.

C. Defendant B reached around 14:18, around 119:00 on the same day in the vicinity of the shooting distance of 119:00s.

In the above place, the left or the left-hand turn turn or the internship was added to the left-hand turn, but Defendant B attempted to turn to the left-hand or the left-hand turn-on road without turning on the direction, etc., and attempted to make a U-turn in the part that did not reach the permitted section of the U.S.ton.

However, the plaintiff, who was behind the defendant vehicle immediately following it, thought that he would not turn on the direction direction etc. of the defendant vehicle, entered the above left-hand or internship vehicle, and the defendant vehicle entered the above left-hand or to the left-hand turn-hand and left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on to the left-hand side of the defendant vehicle, but the defendant vehicle entered the above left-hand or the left-hand turn-hand turn-on to the left-hand side of the defendant vehicle, but the defendant vehicle did not avoid, but the part of the left-hand wheels of the defendant vehicle was shocked to the right-hand side part

E. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff sustained injuries requiring two weeks’ medical treatment, and the Plaintiff’s 1,165,000 won was damaged as repair costs.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence No. 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the accident of this case occurred in the plaintiff 1,165,00 won for repair, medical expenses of 1,652,310 won for medical expenses, lost income of 126,829,982 won, and MIM photography expenses of 845.

arrow