1. Defendant N,O, P, Q, R, T, U, V, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AH, AI, and AJ shall be in the previous week of the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 30, 194, the land of 8,826 square meters in Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si and 8 Madern Forest Land (hereinafter “instant land before the instant subdivision”) was divided into 9 square meters in AK Forest and 9 Madern (1,884 square meters) and 8 Madern (793 square meters) in AL maintenance on November 30, 194. On December 2, 1958, AK parcel number was again divided into 4 parts of AO forest and 3,967 square meters (hereinafter “AO”; hereinafter “AO land”; hereinafter “instant land”); 1 parts of AP forest and 7 square meters (1,686 square meters) on December 23, 1967; hereinafter “AP forest and 50 square meters on December 30, 1972, divided into 195 AP forest and 496 square meters on May 3, 195.

Since then on March 18, 2002, the remaining AO, AP, and Q lot number, excluding AL lot number, are combined with AK forest land of 8,03 square meters, which remains at present.

B. Meanwhile, the land before the instant partition was owned by Nonparty 1/3, respectively, and thereafter, the net AS shares were completed in the name of the deceased AU on June 4, 1945 due to the inheritance of Australia, and the AR shares were completed in the name of Defendant A on November 2, 1967 due to the agreement division inheritance.

C. On November 30, 2001, Defendant A sold all shares to the net AV, and completed the registration of transfer on December 6, 2001, and thereafter, on March 27, 2002, Defendant A sold 1/6 shares to the net AW and Defendant B, respectively, and completed the registration of transfer on April 12, 2002.

On September 3, 2002, the net AW and Defendant B sold 1/3 shares (i/6 1/6) in respect of the instant land acquired prior to the instant partition to the net AU and the net AV, respectively, to Defendant C and AM on September 13, 2002, and completed the registration of transfer on September 13, 2002.

As a result, the entire land before the division of this case is currently owned jointly by the network AT, Defendant C, and Defendant AM, respectively.

On the other hand, Defendant N,O, P, Q, R, T, U,V, W, Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AE, AF, AH, AI, and AJ are the successors of the network AT. The inheritance shares of the above Defendants are the same as those in the separate sheet. Defendant H and I are the successors of the network AV, Defendant J, K, L, L, M are the successors of the network AW, Defendant E, F, G, and D are the successors of the network AW.