Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

The evidence of No. 2425 of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, which was seized, was 1 to 2014.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 15, 2014, the Defendants, who were in charge of the crackdownd Ltel 402, 301, 302, 303, 304, and 305 of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu Ltel, recommended business places on the advertisement site of "M", "N", and "P after employing a female employee through the "O" website, etc., and the Defendants, as the president of the above business place, told Defendant H to manage the above business place as a whole, and Defendant A, as the chief of the above business place, intended to play a role of guiding customers to receive pre-contract calls from customers at the above business place.

On April 15, 2014, at around 01:45, the Defendants conspired to receive 150,000 won from the customers who found the place at the above business place, and let Q (Ga) who is female employees engage in sexual intercourse with the above customers so as to arrange sexual traffic, as well as arranging sexual traffic. From March 15, 2014 to April 15, 2014, the Defendants arranged sexual traffic by having female employees receive the price for sexual traffic from seven customers on an average day from the above business place to make a sexual intercourse with the above customers.

2. On June 23, 2014, the Defendants, as described in paragraph (1), came to operate a re-commercial trade establishment, which was controlled by the operation of the P’s sexual traffic business establishment as described in paragraph (1), and Defendant A was willing to manage the overall management of the said establishment, and Defendant H was willing to manage the female employees, etc.

At around 21:00 on June 23, 2014, the Defendants conspired and received 290,000 won for sexual traffic from the customers who found the place in the above business place, and had the female employees do sexual intercourse with the above customers, thereby arranging sexual traffic, as well as arranging sexual traffic. From June 7, 2014 to June 23, 2014, the Defendants arranged sexual traffic by having female employees receive sexual intercourse with the above customers by receiving the price for sexual traffic from five customers on an average daily basis from the above business place to June 23, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. U, Q, V.