A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Department of Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, which was seized, No. 957, 2013.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Height 16]

1. From around August 2013 to January 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name of “E” or “F” as “E (trade name)” under Article 4302 in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si; (b) employed a female employee G, HH, I, J, K, etc.; and (c) assisted a female employee in the atmosphere by having the female employee in the atmosphere sexual traffic relationship with the guest; and (d) had the female employee in the atmosphere, who visited the said business place, directed him/her to the guest room for the payment for sexual traffic; and (e) had the female employee in the atmosphere conduct sexual traffic by having him/her sexual intercourse with the guest.

2. The Defendant from June 19, 2014 to the same year.

6. From 20th to 20th to 20th to 10th to 20th to 10th to 10 million won per customer by employing Ma, N,O, P, Q, and R, who are female women in Thai-si L 202, and allowing female employees to engage in an act of massage for profit by having the son who found the above place of business cover 10,000 won per customer.

3. The Defendant received 130,000 won from the unclaimed male grandchildren who visit the above business place at the time and place indicated in paragraph (2) as the price for sexual traffic, and paid 50,000 won among them to M, and made M have caused M to put his sexual flag into the sexual intercourse, and arranged sexual traffic by allowing M to have sexual intercourse.

[2016 Highest 2180]

4. On March 15, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim who seeks to collect the amount of KRW 20 million from S who met or died of the victim C in the street in the Seoul Western-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City. The Defendant would receive the amount of KRW 20 million from S.’s children. Expenses need to be borne.

On August 10, 2013, the defendant knew the victim of the defect that the victim would no longer bear any further expenses.