logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.07.13 2016고합26
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of three years and six months and fine of 50,000,000 won, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and six months, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 19, 2009 to February 13, 2013, Defendant A served as the specialized appointment and research institute in the area of atmosphere and indoor air, R& performance management, etc., and deemed public officials pursuant to the Act on the Management of Public Institutions by taking charge of research management of D projects and performance management. On March 1, 2013, Defendant A was newly appointed as AAAB and an assistant professor, and was assigned to the said department from March 1, 2014 to the head of the said department, and was assigned to the said department and assigned the overall academic affairs management. On July 8, 2014, Defendant A was in charge of the examination of documents and the grading of demonstration lectures.

Defendant

B From April 2007, the representative director of AD (hereinafter referred to as “AD”) for the purpose of environmental consulting, etc. in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 804 from April 2007 is a person in charge of overall management of AD’s fund operation.

Defendant

C From July 1992 to May 1, 1992, C is the representative of AF who conducts the inspection of substances, etc. in the Guang City AE, 505 and 507, and from May 1998 to May 1, 1998, the actual operator of AG (hereinafter referred to as “AG”) who is engaged in the business of manufacturing machinery for special purposes in the Guang City AE and 608.

Defendant

D is a person who was newly appointed as an assistant professor with the above AA University AB around August 2014 and was in office as an assistant professor of the above AA University.

2. Defendant A

A. B Subsequent acceptance of bribery after the early 201, the Defendant was the state R&D administered in the Z from AD, an environmental consulting firm, B, which was located in the early 201. In relation to D projects, the case is about KRW 20 million when the Defendant was selected.

Upon request of the purport that “the consent was given.”

The defendant shall receive from B a written request for project proposal (RFP) to be prepared by the Z expert member after receiving the request from B as above.

arrow