logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.06.21 2015고합92
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
Text

[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for 8 years and fine of 380,000,000 won

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Gohap 92] (Defendant A) The Defendant was in charge of landscaping construction supervision in P 1, 2, Qb block (W3 complex), Sable block (W4 complex), Sable block (W11 complex), and TW block (W10 complex) from March 2012 to March 30, 2015.

From the end of 2012, the Defendant purchased land in the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea under the name of the Republic of Korea, and newly built a car page, and send children to the Republic of Korea.

When there is a need for investment funds to be invested in the study fund and the Philippines, the defendant used the supervisory position in the construction site and caused the subcontractor to enter into the construction contract with the subcontractor and demanded a certain portion of the construction cost in return, the method of receiving the return of the construction cost through the lending company of the construction trade name related to the added work due to the change in design and design, using the situation where the amount of the construction has been paid in excess of the actual design amount through the issuance of the false tax invoice, and then receiving the return.

1. On July 31, 2012, around 11, 2012, LH landscaping Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Y”) in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) concluded a construction contract for the construction work of 14,373,000,000 won for the second section landscaping (hereinafter “Y”) and around 14,373,000 won for the 2nd section landscaping (hereinafter “Y”), and around February 1, 2013, with respect to the construction work of 1,32,059, and W apartment complex.

Upon receipt of a request from the Defendant, a corporation AA (hereinafter referred to as “A”) operated by B from a university after a year, to enter into this subcontract contract, the Defendant exercised pressure to allow the contractor to select the said AA as a subcontractor for landscaping and, in return, exercised the subcontract contract amount from the said B.

arrow