logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.05.25 2016고단115
업무상횡령
Text

1. Defendant A’s fine of KRW 40 million is imposed on Defendant A.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【Work Experience, Job, etc.】

1. From May 3, 2005, the representative director P from May 3, 2005 to the overall control of the business, such as the execution of funds of the above company

2. Promotion of Defendant B’s chemical engineering and appointment of a full-time lecturer at Q University on or around March 1994 by regular professors around March 2005.

3. The promotion of Defendant C to the Korea National University food engineering and full-time instructors on September 1, 2002 by regular professors on September 1, 2002

4. On October 24, 1995, Defendant D’s representative director (one shareholder) of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (one transferee), even after transferring 60% of the shares of the said company on November 9, 2006, he/she held office as a representative director until December 18, 2009, and held general administration, including fund execution, on August 26, 2010, when he/she held office as a representative director.

5. From February 2005, Defendant E’s graduate from a graduate school (chemical engineering major) of QU in QU in 1998 to three individuals: U (spouse: QU in 2005, and QU (spouse: QU, AAB, P (State), universities, enterprises, etc., with various experimental equipment and materials produced / [criminal facts] The following criminal facts were partially handled, and the remainder was omitted.

1. Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”) is also described with the same number as “Defendant A”.

In March 2012, Defendant 1 (A) requested that Defendant 5 (E) of the supplier of the research goods through employees AE, etc. return money after deducting the value-added tax, etc. concerning the country’s research and development task (hereinafter “AD”), although the State’s research and development task cannot be used for any purpose that is not directly related to the performance of the task at the time, in connection with the P’s research and development task (hereinafter “AD”), Defendant 1 (A) requested that Defendant 5 (E) return money after deducting the value-added tax, etc. from the payment for the research equipment cost. In addition, instead of the research equipment, Defendant 1’s supply of company equipment, such as computer and AD plaque, etc.

Defendant

1(A) At that time, the Korean Institute of Environmental Industry and Technology, which is an institution specialized in the foregoing research and development task (institution specializing in research expenses), shall be deposited into an exclusive research fund management account and keep it on its business.

arrow