logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.11.21 2019고단1781
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Highest 2019 highest 1781;

A. On March 16, 2019, the Defendant entering a building: (a) around 11:00, the Daegu Dong-gu B building; and (b) the “D intersection” managed by the victim C of the second floor, the Defendant opened an office door which is closed after entering the office through an open entrance for the purpose of theft of the articles located therein; and (c) intruded the victim’s building.

B. A thief: (a) the Defendant: (b) stolen the victim’s crepits under the supervision of the said victim at the time and place of the statement in paragraph (a); (c) had one set of No. 850,000 won, the market price of the victim’s possession.

C. On August 1, 2016, the Defendant acquired one of the gallon 4 smartphones equivalent to KRW 500,000 in the market value where the victim G was lost from around “F” located in Jung-gu, Daegu, Daegu, at around 06:00, around August 2016.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

(2) On February 2, 2017, the Defendant acquired 20,000 won in cash, which was owned by the victim I lost, 20,000 won in the middle-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and one wall with which the market price contained in one national card is unknown.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

(3) On January 14, 2019, around 06:00, the Defendant acquired one copy of the Nonghyup Card that was lost by the Victim K, which was not known of the market price.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

(4) The Defendant on January 2019.

arrow