Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s bodily injury, around March 2, 2014, on the ground that the Defendant took a cell phone of the Defendant, which fell short of the floor, while drinking alcohol at the “E” alcohol house located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 21:00, when she went through a dispute with the victim G (the age of 44) who was the son of the victim F, and went by hand, the Defendant sustained the victim G head and back of the victim G, thereby causing an injury to the victim G for about two weeks.

2. Defendant A, at around March 21, 2014, was arrested as a flagrant offender upon being informed of the summary of the crime, the right to appoint a defense counsel, and the opportunity to defend himself/herself due to the criminal facts as stated in the above 1.3.20, at around 21:20, he/she received 112 report on the road in front of the Seoul Western-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and was called out.

When the above I arrested Defendant A as above and carried them onto the patrol vehicle, Defendant B, who was in the next place, was able to take a bath, her hand, her head debt of the above I, her skes, and walked by drinking her head, and her walked the bridge on a hand.

Accordingly, Defendant A also abused the above I's head debt and walking the bridge on a hand by scambling it.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers.

3. Defendant A’s obstruction of the performance of official duties on March 2, 2014, on the road in the way that Defendant A was on board the patrol box and was carried out by the H patrol box at around 21:23, 2014, and Defendant A committed assault, such as assaulting the back part of the part of the service clothes on the part of the patrol box, which was driven by the mid-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station H patrol box, while driving.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning I, L, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;