A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 28, 2014, at around 23:20 on November 28, 2014, the Defendant committed assault to the victims, such as the victim E(16), an employee of the said main shop in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, by cherbing the disturbance at the main point, such as hinginginginginging, hinginginginginginging, and disputing with the drinking and drinking, etc., with a large amount of sound from the drinking and drinking, and hinging the body of the victim by taking the breath of the body of the assault against the victim from the victim’s hand. On the other hand, the victim E(16 years old) who was an employee of the said main shop in which the said body of the assault was taken from the cell phone to the cell phone, and assaulting the victims, such as hinging the part of the ging part six times in number.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim by force, such as: (a) the time and place described in the preceding paragraph; (b) the victim C and his employee, who is the owner of the said main shop, are able to take a disturbance over about 30 minutes; and (c) the victim’s main business was obstructed by force, such as avoiding disturbance throughout about 30 minutes, allowing other customers to go without paying the drinking value properly; or preventing them from entering new customers.

3. The Defendant: (a) committed an assault, such as assault, obstruction of duty, etc., at the time, date, and place of the performance of official duties; (b) the Defendant was asked by G, a patroler at the Yacheon-dong Police Station Fab, Yabab, who was dispatched to the site after having received a report of 112 regarding the assault, obstruction of duty, etc.; (c) was able to ask questions about the expulsion and circumstances of the incident from G, a patroler at the Yaunnam-dong Police Station; (d) was able to knick G’s hand with the knat; and (d) he arrested a flagrant offender

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of C, E, and H

1. Articles 314(1) (Interference with Business), 136(1), and 260(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts shall be selected as imprisonment with prison labor, respectively.