Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 13, 2014, at around 23:40, Defendant A was engaged in E at the Fno clubs operated on the first floor of the area D (the age of 42) in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and reported 112, and was requested by the police officer belonging to the G District District G District of the YY, Hacheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the police officer, who was called for the investigation of the instant case, and was able to dively conduct the instant investigation from the I police officer, and was able to dively boom the instant H’s ethth with his hand, and the Defendant dived it over the floor by putting the ethth of the said I’s eth.

Accordingly, the two police officers who were additionally dispatched upon the above I's request for support were arrested as a flagrant offender, and the defendant resisted the above H's bridge by walking the above H's bridge with a view to walking the elevator floor and walking the above H's bridge on the elevator floor.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the above H and the above I's 112-report processing as police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. Defendant B, a police officer belonging to the same district unit, who was called upon a request for assistance at around 23:50 on the same day, arrested the Defendant’s first-hand captain A, who was a police officer assigned to the same district unit, in a flagrant offender committing an offense of obstruction of performance of official duties and reported the Defendant to take aboard the elevator in order to interfere with this, the Defendant left the elevator door with the elevator door and carried the arms in hand by hand.

Then, the Defendant was found to have closed the door of the patrol car in which the saidJ intends to board A at the patrol club before the said karaoke club, and maintained the arms of saidJ.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders by the above JJ, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B by the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Each police statement made to E, H, I, and J;

1. An investigation report, an investigation report (to hear police officers' statements from J, I, and H at the time of arrest);