Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who drives a vehicle for the use of B rocketing taxi as his/her duties.

On August 3, 2020, the Defendant, at around 23:30, was proceeding to the intersection of the 301 large-scale apartment as in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, in the direction of the intersection of the eropo-gu, in the direction of the intersection of the ero-gu.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the accident in accordance with the signals as the signal apparatus is well reported to the intersection at which the signal apparatus is installed and as the signal apparatus instructs.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this by entering the intersection in contravention of stop signal and shocked the part on the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the front side of the D Launta cab driven by the victim C (Nam, 73 years old) who opened the intersection in accordance with the progress signal from the left side of the course to the right side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim C, such as duplicating duplicating fuss, which was in need of approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence. The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E (n't, 38 years of age) who was on board the said damaged vehicle, such as the right pelle fusging, etc. which requires medical treatment for about 184 days, and suffered from the injury of the victim F (n't, South, and 54 years of age) who was on board the Defendant vehicle for about 12 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C, F, and E;

1. A blackbox and video CD;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are signals.