beta
Text
1. We affirm that the Defendant’s refusal to re-election against the Plaintiffs on January 29, 2016 is null and void.
2. The defendant, as well as a family.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates the E University (hereinafter “Defendant University”).
The defendant, on February 13, 2009, set the term of appointment from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2016, appointed the plaintiff A as an associate professor for child welfare counseling and psychological division for the defendant's university, and the plaintiff C as an associate professor for the defendant's university management department, respectively. The term of appointment on April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2012 set the term of appointment as an associate professor for the defendant's new university, and appointed the plaintiff B as an associate professor for the defendant's college, and the term of appointment on August 25, 2010 to August 24, 2014 to the defendant's college president.
B. On September 18, 2015, the Defendant’s vicarious appointment of the president of the Defendant University on behalf of the Plaintiff A and B was assessed to be less than 70 points on September 18, 2015, and if the Plaintiff wishes to be reappointed, the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff of the submission of the required documents (a list of research records, records of research, records of community service, list of community service records, list of church service records, and other records of performance) by October 31, 2015. On October 31, 2015, Plaintiff A filed an application for deliberation on reappointment with the Defendant on October 30, 2015. (2) The Defendant University Teachers’ Personnel Committee of the Defendant University submitted an application for deliberation on reappointment to the Plaintiff A and B on January 4, 2016. As a result of the review on reappointment of the said Plaintiffs, it was assessed to be less than 70 points in the evaluation of reappointment as described in the Plaintiff A and B, or notified the Plaintiff of the Plaintiff’s written opinion as follows.
As indicated below. In the basic examination for the plaintiff A, the 1st appraiser 90 points for the comprehensive evaluation, 89 points for the comprehensive evaluation, and 29.33 points for the average of 69.33 points for the evaluation (general points).