Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 23, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year from the Incheon District Court (2016No. 4529) to six months of imprisonment for fraud, and the said judgment was finalized on December 31, 2016.

1. Crimes against enzympic Capital;

A. On June 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered 20-gil2, 204, as Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in the management consulting office (main) office for business b0-gil2, 204, the Defendant was in custody of the Defendant, using a color pen for the purpose of uttering, “A installment financing agreement, B; (b) the contractor B; (c) the address of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Guro-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government electronic display board of information on goods; (d) KRW 3,60,000, 300,000 won on installment terms, 24 months on installment terms, and 24 months on installment terms; and (e) the applicant B.

B his seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a copy of installment financing agreement in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant at the time, place, and place of Paragraph (a) of Section 1 applied for a loan to enzn Capital (ju), and exercised the said written agreement as if it had been duly concluded as if it had been duly formed with respect to an employee who could not know the name of the above written consulting (ju) that could not know the forgery.

(c)

The Defendant forged a written agreement on installment financing in the name of B to loan KRW 3,600,000 in order to enable the Defendant to purchase electronic displays while driving as if the Defendant was B, as described in the above 1-A and B-B, and applied for a loan to the victim’s filial capital through the above business L&C consulting (ju).

However, in fact B did not allow the defendant to get a loan under his name, and the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the loan because there was no particular income or property.

The Defendant received from the injured party the remittance of KRW 3,600,000 as a loan from the damaged party to the account designated by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.