(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.04.19 2018가단229345

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.04.19 2018가단229345

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant shall each issue in sequence to the plaintiff, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the marks indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 4.

Reasons

1.The following facts shall not be disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged on each entry or image of Gap evidence 1 to 18 together with the purport of the entire pleadings:

Plaintiff

The church (a religious organization) has owned real estate listed in the attached list from May 7, 1970 to the time when the church was a D religious organization and was changed as of the present time after the E religious organization).

B. The Defendant occupied the portion (C) of 18 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “instant company house”) which connects each point of the attached Form Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 4 among the above real estate without permission.

C. The Constitution of the A Religious Organization provides that ① the Council shall be organized into a standing pastor and a Si Council member, ② the Council member shall be the majority of its members, and the resolution shall be made with the attendance of the majority of its members, ③ the above administrative affairs shall include the administrative affairs of church properties, ④ the properties of the church shall be acquired, disposed of, constructed, and borrowed as a resolution of the church, ④ the assembly of the Plaintiff church composed of the standing pastor and the Si armed forces shall be present on August 26, 2018, and two of the registered three members of the Council of the Plaintiff church shall be present on August 26, 2018, and the resolution for the lawsuit of this case was passed by the resolution of a majority of all incumbent members.

On September 9, 2018, at the temporary office meeting of a plaintiff church which was lawfully held on September 9, 2018, 25 of the 27th members from among the 27 members present and resolved as a unanimous decision on the contents of the lawsuit of this case against the defendant.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to deliver the company house of this case to the plaintiff.

3. The plaintiff's claim is accepted.

참조조문

-대한민국헌법

유사 판례

-광주지방법원목포지원 2012.05.17 2011가합2703

-광주고등법원 2013.01.30 2012나2926

-대전지방법원논산지원 2014.10.29 2013가합1075

-전주지방법원 2014.11.27 2011나2817