2020Gohap567(a) Murder (Preliminary Crime: Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Crimes)

Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Child Abuse (Death or Injury by Child Abuse)

(b) Violation of the Child Welfare Act (Habitual child abuse);

(c) Violation of the Child Welfare Act (Habitual neglect of a child);

(d) Violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abuse);

(e) Violation of the Child Welfare Act;

2021.Scand 6(combined) An order to attach

2021Report4(Consolidated) Probation Order

1.(a)(c)(d) A;

2. D. B

Kim Purification (prosecution), Kim Cleanup, Park Jin-sil, and static (Trial)

Attorney C (for the defendant)

Law Firm D (For the defendant)

Attorney E

May 14, 2021

Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for life and for five years, respectively.

Defendants order the completion of each child abuse treatment program for 200 hours.

The defendants shall be ordered to place employment restrictions on child-related institutions for each ten years.

All requests for the instant attachment order and probation order are dismissed.

Criminal facts

The Defendants are married, and the victim F (8 months to 16 months) is adopted by both the Defendants.

Defendant A sent an annual grace period to the United States, while working in the incorporated association G, and became interested in the adoption of a child. Although there was no deep concern about the composition of a family through adoption of a child, the responsibility of his parents, and the parenting of a child, the Defendants were able to adopt a female with less the basis to have a emotional relationship with the female in the course of the growth of Ha (3 years of age), who is her father and wife, and continued the adoption procedure. The Defendants began living with the victim on January 17, 2020, and on February 3, 2020, the Seoul Family Court's decision to permit the adoption of a child became final and conclusive and became the victim's parents and brought up the victim together.

1. Defendant A

(a) Violation of the Child Welfare Act (Habitual child abuse);

In a situation where the Defendant is raising her aged-friendly daughters, the Defendant adopted a child abuse report to raise her aged two daughters, and was under stress on the ground that the victim was not able to grow up or boomed well, and that the adopted victim was not able to grow up. In addition, since the end of March 2020, the head of a child-care center, who was found in the body frequently, such as the victim’s math, see, bucks, bucks, and ship, reported child abuse around May 2020. After that, the child abuse report was filed on around July 200 and around September 200, the Defendant sent the child abuse report to the neighboring persons, including those who were suspected of the Defendant’s abuse, and the Defendant was aware of the victim’s abuse from around July 17, 2020 to around September 20.

On June 2020, the Defendant, at the home of the Defendant in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I J, assessed the top left-down of the victim (11 months at that time) by using the above rearing stress, etc., and led the victim to the left-down third frame.

From October 12, 2020, the Defendant habitually abused the victim on several occasions, such as the list 1 of the annexed crime list, and committed physical abuse that may harm the victim’s body or harm physical health and development, such as physical abuse of the victim’s body, by assaulting the victim on several occasions, and then harming the victim’s life or physical development, by cutting off the left-hand aggregate, the right-hand bed, the back bed, the back-hand bed, the back-up bed, the right-hand bed, the back-up bed, the back-up bed, the back-hand bed, the hair back on the left-hand bed, the extracting damage, and the liver bed.

(b) homicide;

From October 13, 2020 to October 10:15, 2020, the Defendant: (a) during the period from around 09:01 to around 10:15, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Victim could die when the Victim was able to exercise strong power over the part of the part of the part of the victim (k 79cm, size 9.5km) for 16 months after the Victim’s physical condition had been continuously abused from the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s home; (b) but, on the ground that the Victim was not taking bread, the Victim’s blusium was deprived by force on the part of the Victim; and (c) during the period from around 0:10 on the part of the Victim’s body, the Victim’s body was cut off and cut down by force on the part of the Victim’s body; and (d) the Victim was dead on the part of the Victim’s body to prevent the other’s body from spreading the part of the Victim’s body.

Accordingly, the Defendant murdered the victim.

C. Violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abuse);

On August 18, 2020, at around 13:38, the Defendant forced the victim (the 14th month at that time) who was fright at the Defendant’s house to punish the two legs, and forced the victim to repeat the same act while driving the bridge without centering it. However, the Defendant forced the victim to repeat the same act, thereby causing pain and fears to the victim. From that point to September 25, 2020, the Defendant committed emotional abuse that may inflict an injury on the mental health and development of the victim five times, as shown in Table 2 of the List of Crimes.

(d) Violation of the Child Welfare Act (Habitual neglect of a child);

On March 5, 2020, from around 16:30 to 20:24, the Defendant was in the house of the Defendant located in MN of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim did not have the ability to protect his own body as a infant, and the victim did not have the ability to protect his own body as an infant, and when a dangerous situation occurs while living together with the victim at all times, the victim was able to immediately protect the victim, while going out the house and let the victim married for about 3:54 minutes and 54 minutes.

The Defendant neglected to protect and rear the victims, who are children under his protection and supervision, including food, clothing, etc., by making them mixed with the victims over 15 times, such as the attached Table 3, from around October 2020, to August 20, 190.

(e) Violation of the Child Welfare Act;

From September 2020 to September 23, 2020 to September 23, 2020, the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as supplying nutritions in an appropriate way or having the hospital receive treatment by being taken care of the body of the Defendant, such as: (a) the victim was abused from the Defendant; (b) she she was sheshesheshel and she was sheshed, and the body was shed, and his/her body was considerably reduced due to she failed to take proper measures.

Accordingly, the defendant neglected to protect, rear, and treat the victims who are children under his protection and supervision, including food, clothing and shelter.

2. Defendant B

A. Violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abuse);

피고인은 2020, 4. 5. 20:04경 서울 강서구 M N호에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 무릎에 피해자(당시 9개월)를 앉힌 다음 양손으로 피해자의 양팔을 꽉 잡아 피해자로 하여금 빠르고 강하게 손빽을 치게 하여 이에 고통을 느낀 피해자가 울음을 터뜨렸음에도 멈추지 않고 계속하여 피해자의 팔을 잡아 강하게 손뼉을 치게 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed emotional abuse that harms the mental health and development of children.

(b) Child Welfare violation;

The Defendant, as both parts of the victim, knew from March 2020 to October 8, 2020 that Defendant A would be able to have a baby victim married in a frequent residential area or in a motor vehicle, as seen above, but did not take measures to restrain Defendant A or separate the victim from Defendant A, and rather, the Defendant and the victim were able to be mixed with the victim in the motor vehicle, as shown in the attached Table No. 3 year No. 150, Apr. 15, 2020, as shown in the attached Table No. 17:30, April 17, 2020.

In addition, from June 200 to October 12, 2020, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the body of the victim was seriously deteriorated due to the Defendant’s abuse, such as the victim’s suffering from decentralization due to parenting stress, etc., and frequently assaulted the victim. In September 2020, the Defendant her body was considerably decreased because the victim abusedd from the Defendant Company A her right side, and the body weight was considerably decreased since the victim was blshed to the right side of the victim. However, the Defendant did not take any measures such as preventing the victim from taking proper treatment to the hospital, preventing the victim from committing violence against the Defendant, or separating the victim from the Defendant A, and did not take any measures such as separating the victim from the Defendant.

Thus, from March 2020 to October 12, 2020, the Defendant neglected the victim with the Defendant to neglect in the parking lot along with the victim from March 2020 to October 12, 202, or neglected to protect, rear, and treat the victim, who is a child under his protection and supervision, by failing to take any measures to protect the victim, even though the Defendant knew that the victim's body was suffering from the victim's abuse as above, by neglecting the victim's negligence in the parking lot, or by neglecting the victim's body so that the victim may frequently be confused with the victim's house, and frequently assault the victim's body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness0, P, Q, R, S, T, U,V, and W;

1. Each police statement of the R (Evidence 3,253), X, Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, and AE;

1. 내사보고(AF 입양아동 관련 자료 분석 및 첨부), 수사보고(L병원 소아청소년과 의사진술 청취), 수사보고(CCTV 확인 - 피해아동 어린이집 등·하원 모습 등 확인), 수사보고[압수수색검증영장 집행(AG 내과의원, AF)], 내사보고(아동학대 112 신고자 AH 소아과 원장 면담), 수사보고(입양 전, 후 엑스레이 사진 비교), 수사보고(9. 23.자 AI어린이집 CCTV 영상자료 확인), 수사보고(9. 24.자 AI어린이집 CCTV 영상자료 확인), 수사보고(9, 25.자 AI어린이집 CCTV 영상자료 확인), 수사보고(9. 28.자 AI어 린이집 CCTV 영상자료 확인), 수사보고(9. 29.자 AI어린이집 CCTV 영상자료 확인), 수사보고(10. 12.자 AI어린이집 CCTV 영상자료 확인), 수사보고(AF Q 사회복지사추가 진술), 수사보고(2020. 10. 13. 피의자 A 주거지 엘리베이터 내부 CCTV 확인), 내사보고(피해자 건강보험내역 확인 요청), 수사보고(F 진료확인내역, 처방조제 점검내역 첨부), 수사보고(A의 119 신고 녹취파일 첨부), 수사보고(사건번호 2020-6236 익명신고자 전화진술), 수사보고(B, A AJ 영장집행 결과 회신 및 분석), 수사보고(피의자 A 운동하는 AK 상대 수사), 수사보고(익명신고자 전화진술 2), 수사보고(F의 몸무게 변화), 수사보고('AF' 엑스레이 원본 필름 임의제출 및 영상기록 감정 회신 등), 수사보고[AL호 S(가명) 주거지 엘리베이터 CCTV 확인], 수사보고(피해자 골절부위별 상세 설명), 수사보고(피의자의 시어머니 AM 상대 탐문수사), 수사보고(피의자들 주거지 엘리베이터 내부 CCTV 영상 분석결과), 수사보고(CCTV 분석을 통한 2020, 10. 13. A의 행적), 수사보고(익명 제보 동영상 확인), 수사보고(익명신고자 문자진술 3), 수사보고(학대의심 동영상 분석), 수사보고(익명제보자의 제보내용 등 수사), 수사보고(익명제보자 제공 동영상 전자정보 첨부), 수사보고(AT기관 상대 압수수색 검증영장 집행), 수사보고(피의자들의 주거지 엘리베이터 내부 CCTV 영상분석), 수사보고(피해자 F의 부검결과에 대한 법의관 U의 구두 설명), 수사보고(L병원 소아과 전문의 AN 구두 진술), 수사보고(변사 당일 A·B 행적 수사), 수사보고[Z(가명)이 제출한 4. 15. 식당 결제 내역서 첨부], 수사보고(법의학 교수 V의 의견서 첨부), 수사보고(L병원 영상의학과 전문의 상대 수사), 수사보고(L병원 응급의학과 전문의 AO 소견), 수사보고(AP 정형외과 전문의 의사 AQ 상대 수사), 수사보고(피의자들 휴대폰 통화내역 및 데이터 패킷 위치 분석을 통한 이 사건 방임행위 범행사실 보강), 수사보고(부검의 U 상대 구두진술 청취), 수사보고(피해자 F의 쇄골 골절 시기 등 수사), 수사보고(췌장이 절단되어 흘러나온 효소액이 다른 장기를 손상시키는 시기 추정에 대한 수사), 수사보고(2020. 4. 15. 피의자 차량의 건물 주차장 입출기록 확인), 수사보고(L병원 소아영상의학과 전문의 AR 소견), 수사보고(피의자 A진술 관련 행위 재연 영상), 수사보고(피의자 간 피해자에 대한 폭력 언급 AJ 대화 확인), 수사보고(어린이집 생활 사진으로 판단되는 피해자 집중학대기간), 수사보고 (피의자 A 방임혐의 중 B 방조혐의 관련 입증), 수사보고(9. 17. 골절의심 동영상 의료자문회신 결과보고), 수사보고(학대의심 동영상 의료자문회신 결과보고), 수사보고 (어린이집 원장 전화진술 청취 보고), 수사보고(A 생리기간 심리상태 관련), 수사보고(10. 6. 동영상에서 보이는 피해자 겨드랑이 상처 관련), 수사보고(10. 13. 동영상으로 본 사망 당일 아침 상황)

1. Table of 112 reported cases, report on the results of investigation, report on the results of internal investigation, and closure of internal investigation; and

1. Records of progress counseling, results of health examinations before adoption, records of cases of the Supreme Court Na, summary of cases, records of infant examinations, records of infant examinations, anonymous reports, records of entry and departure, records of data on May 25, AU institution, data on June 29, AU institution, AU institution 9.23, data on September 23, AU institution 9., records of services provided by AU institution, requests for investigation, receipts, etc., each of the currencies, records of entry and departure, and the contents of AJ dialogue;

1. A written autopsy report, on-site autopsy records, on-site autopsy records, on-site autopsy records, reports on the results of field identification, certificates of medical records, copies of medical examination records, each medical consultation sheet, each medical advisory meeting, medical advisory meeting and inspection results sheet, each medical advisory meeting, opinion opinion, e-mail response report on the results of clinical psychology analysis, notification on the results of actions analysis conducted by a medical advisory group and a medical specialist, notification on the results of clinical psychology analysis, questioning research institute, inquiry report, medical opinion opinion, reply, and request prior investigation report;

1. On-site identification photographs, each photograph, AJ output, each CCTV image-facognizing room, X-ray photographs, alley image image, AJ text message output (Evidence 399);

1. Each CD, each USB, each external set, 119 sound records, siren-type video files, and video CDs;

1. Habituality of Defendant A’s ruling: The dampness may be recognized in light of the method and frequency of the crimes committed by each of the crimes listed in paragraphs (a) and (d) of Article 1 of the Criminal Act, the period and period of the crimes, and the same kind of crimes repeated several times;

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 72, Article 71(1)2, Article 17 subparag. 3 (a) of the Child Welfare Act, Article 250(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 71(1)2, Article 17 subparag. 5 (a) of the Child Welfare Act, Article 72, Article 71(1)2, and Article 71(1)2, and Article 71 subparag. 6 of the Child Welfare Act, Article 72, Article 71(1)2, and Article 17 subparag. 6 of the Child Welfare Act, Article 30 (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 71(1)2, and Article 17 subparag. 6 (a) of the Child Welfare Act, Article 71(1)2, and Article 17 subparag. 6 (a) of the Child Welfare Act, Article 71(2) of the Child Welfare Act

B. Defendant B: Article 71(1)2, Article 17 subparag. 5 of the Child Welfare Act (the point of child abuse, the choice of imprisonment), Article 71(1)2, and Article 17 subparag. 6 of the Child Welfare Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of neglecting a child’s abandonment, the choice of imprisonment), Article 71(1)2, and Article 17 subparag. 6 of the Child Welfare Act (the point of neglecting a child’s abandonment as shown in the attached Table No. 3 of the crime No. 2-B of the crime at the time of sale), 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of neglecting a child’s abandonment, the point of neglecting a child’s abandonment, and the choice of imprisonment)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

(a) Defendant A: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)1, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the first sentence of Article 38(1)1 of the Criminal Act shall not be imposed, since a person selects a punishment for life for murder with the largest punishment);

(b) Defendant B: Violation of the remaining Child Welfare Act, excluding the fact of the abandonment or neglect of a child listed in the attached Table 3 years No. 3 of the List of Crimes in Article 2-b of the Criminal Act, which is the most severe crime (the period of concurrent crimes with the punishment prescribed in the crime of abandonment of a child)

1. Order to complete programs;

Article 8(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Crimes

1. An employment restriction order;

The main sentence of Article 29-3(1) of the Child Welfare Act

Judgment on the assertion of Defendant A and his defense counsel

1. Summary of the assertion

(a) Crimes of violating the Child Welfare Act (Habitual child abuse);

1) The right-to-hand Written Abandonment (attached Form 1 No. 300,00 per annum)

The defendant does not have any fact of leaving the victim's right side outside of the original leaving part of the victim's right side by assessing buckbucks to the right side.

(ii) approximately 7§¯ in the aftermast part (attached Form 1 No. 4 per annum in the list of offenses).

The defendant does not have any fact of cutting down the part of the back head of the victim and cutting down the part of the victim's back.

3) To the right-hand walone abandonment (attached Table 1 No. 500,00 per annum)

There is no fact that the defendant has concealed the victim's right-hand side in return for the price of the victim's right-hand side and then has abandoned the victim's right.

(iv) the 8th and 10th to the left, the 10th and the right 10th to the right, (attached Table 1 No. 6).

There is no fact that the defendant added up the 8th and the 10th to the left side of the victim at prices such as the left side of the victim, or added up the 10th to the right side of the victim at prices such as the right side of the victim.

(v) the left-hand pelkes, etc. (attached Form 1 No. 7)

There is no fact that the defendant added up the left side of the victim to the left side of the victim or caused a spawn on the head side by pricing the left side or head of the victim.

(b) homicide;

Although the Defendant was unable to drink the victim with a breadbing, there was no strong force to cause the victim’s death, such as taking the victim’s clothes, etc. on the part of the Defendant. The Defendant only committed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (hereinafter referred to as “CPR”) to the victim during the process of taking the victim’s breadbing the victim’s breath and flading the two arms, thereby causing the victim’s death. As such, the Defendant did not have any intention to commit murder to the Defendant.

2. Relevant legal principles

The conviction in a criminal trial ought to be based on evidence having probative value, which makes it possible for a judge to have the truth that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is no evidence to establish such a degree of conviction, even if there is doubt that the defendant is guilty, it is inevitable to determine it as the benefit of the defendant, but such doubt is not necessarily formed by direct evidence, and it is formed by indirect evidence unless it violates the empirical and logical rules. Even if indirect evidence does not have full probative value as to the facts of crime individually, if it is deemed that there is a comprehensive probative value as a whole when comprehensively considering the whole evidence in mutual relation with each other (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2001Do4392, Nov. 27, 2001). Such legal doctrine applies in particular, in a case where a victim cannot make a statement as seen in this case, and a witness witness witness witness witness witness at a scene of crime cannot give testimony, etc., if the defendant denies the crime.

In this case, the Defendant strongly denies that there was no crime of murder, etc., and there is no other direct evidence, and thus, it should be determined whether the Defendant can be recognized of murder, etc. based on the facts that can be recognized by the indirect evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court.

In addition, the intention of murder in the crime of murder does not necessarily require the purpose or planned intention of murder. It is sufficient to recognize or anticipate the possibility or risk of causing the death of another person due to one’s own act, and its recognition or prediction is not only conclusive but also it is so-called willful negligence. In a case where the defendant asserts that there was no intention of murder at the time of the crime, and only the Defendant was only the intention of murder or assault, the determination should be made by comprehensively taking into account the objective circumstances before and after the crime, such as the background leading up to the crime, motive for the crime, types of deadly weapons prepared for the crime, the nature and repetition of the attack, and the possibility of causing the death (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Do734, Apr. 14, 2006).

3. Facts of recognition;

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

A. Marriage life of the Defendants and adoption process of the victims

1) The Defendants were married in the same university for a period of six years on the one-year basis, and were married in May 2013. The Defendant did not wish to give birth to a child and did not wish to give birth to a child for about four years, while the Defendants were given birth to the first child on April 29, 2017.

2) The Defendant: (a) did not want to have the second child’s birth because he was under severe pain after the child’s birth and did not want to have his body deceased; (b) did not want to have the second child’s birth; (c) shared the idea that Defendant B and his children need to have the first child, who wanted to have the first child and the sibling, and decided to have the child adopted.

3) On June 15, 2018, the Defendants visited AF and consulted on adoption, and received an application for adoption from AF on July 13, 2018. On June 13, 2019, the Defendants completed education for preliminary adoption parents. On August 6, 2019, the Seoul Family Court (Seoul Family Court Decision 2019Mo5738) applied for the adoption permission under the Act on Special Cases Concerning Adoption, and the adoption permission was decided by the Seoul Family Court on January 10, 2020, and the decision became final and conclusive on February 3, 2020.

(b) Health status, etc. of victims before adoption;

1) On June 10, 2019, the victim was born at 51cm and 3.6km in body weight. By January 16, 2020, the victim was brought up in a foster home by the Seoul Family Court’s decision to permit adoption. The victim became the house of the Defendants around January 17, 2020, according to the Seoul Family Court’s decision to permit adoption.

2) On December 31, 2019, before the victim was adopted, the result of the infant health examination conducted around December 31, 2019, the victim’s height was 68.3 cm (87 cm 1) and the body weight was 8.4 km (87 cm) and the victim’s body weight was considerably good, among 100 infants of the same age and 100 children of the same gender, to the extent that the height and weight of the victim’s body correspond to 87th.

3) The key of the victim measured on January 14, 2020, immediately before the adoption of the victim, was 69.8cm, the body weight was 8.9cm, and the victim’s chest X-ray photograph taken on January 8, 2020 did not have to be confirmed in terms of the body size of the victim’s chest X-ray photograph.

(c) The status of bringing up victims after adoption;

1) On February 19, 2020, immediately after the adoption of the victim, the Defendant began to appeal for childcare stress, and Defendant B went to Germany from February 19, 2020 to February 27, 2020, and the Defendant experienced difficulties for childcare of two children living abroad even though her frien was able to take childcare measures.

2) After the adoption, the victim was brought up at home after the adoption, but around March 2, 2020, the victim was admitted to the child care center where the Defendants’ first child was brought.

3) On March 24, 2020, around March 24, 2020, the victim's child-care center teacher discovered that there was a big hole in the victim's left side and taken photographs, and the defendant stated that the defendant's speech was made, but the defendant responded that there was a hole.

4) Even after finding out that a victim’s child-care center teacher had a wound, face, and a hole on the face of the victim, he/she taken a photograph of the victim’s upper part of the body nine times from April 2, 2020 to May 25, 2020. When confirming the victim’s upper part of the child-care center on the victim’s upper part, the Defendant responded only to the upper part of the victim’s upper part of the body. The director of the child-care center in which the victim attends the child-care center reported child abuse to AT institution around May 5, 2020 and around 25.

5) On June 12, 2020, the victim under health examinations of infants. As a result, the victim's key was 73.2 cm (37 cm) and the body weight was 9.4 km (65 00 cm) and the size was 9.4 cm (65 00 cm).

6) Even after the above report of child abuse, the victim was sent to the child care center from July 16, 2020, and the victim took part in a hole once every three to four days, and the hole was found mainly in the victim’s face. When the defendant was confirmed at the child care center that confirmed the wife, the defendant avoided the response by asking the reasons different from the transfer of the child abuse report.

7) From July 17, 2020 to September 22, 2020, the victim did not attend a child care center for up to two months. Meanwhile, the Defendants’ first child and the victim’s speech, who is a father and wife, had been enrolled in a child care center normally except for home learning period or vacation period. The Defendant asked for the reasons that the victim does not want to attend a child care center for a long time. The Defendant responded to the Defendant “I would not want to look at the child abuse report as a biased starting line in the surrounding area when the child abuse report was entered, and therefore, I would not send it to the child care center.” On December 4, 2020, the Defendant stated at the third prosecutor’s office that “it was difficult for the head of the second child care center to report the child abuse”.

8) On September 23, 2020, the victim was enrolled in a child care center on or around September 23, 2020. The head of the child care center, when the victim became aware of the victim due to excessive camping, did not seem to have a strong weight, and the victim was unable to walk out and walk out properly due to the lack of the victim’s power, leading the son and the victim in the vicinity of the child care center to undergo medical treatment.

9) The victim applied for a day from September 23, 2020 to September 29, 2020 to a day from September 29, 2020, and the body of the vehicle was good, and the vehicle was first married on September 28, 2020, and was playing with the surrounding play equipment, and around September 29, 2020, she was frightd with the children and frightd with meals and livers provided at the children’s house.

10) From September 30, 2020 to October 12, 2020, the victim was not a member of a child-care center. Finally, the victim was spiting the drinking materials, did not drink water, and did not perform urine activities, such as urine, etc. at all. At the time, the victim was in most physical condition, but only boomed, and the head was immediately cut. The victim was aware of the child-care center teacher in a state where he was unable to walk without playing a day.

11) The director of a child-care center stated that Defendant B was faat the faat hospital by explaining the state of the victim to Defendant B at his home, but Defendant B did not have the victim to the hospital.

(d) The reporting process of child abuse more than three times;

The Defendant was reported on child abuse three times as follows, but all three times was suspected of having completed internal investigation or was not subject to disposition of non-prosecution.

1) Report of the first child abuse dated May 25, 2020

On March 24, 2020, from May 25, 2020 to May 25, 2020, the head of a child care center where the victim was the victim had constantly discovered a scarb or hole from the victim's body. On May 25, 2020, the head of the child care center discovered a bridge, buckbucks, or holes that do not bring about other children's body, and reported child abuse to AT institutions around May 25, 2020.

2) Report on the second child abuse dated June 29, 2020

On June 29, 2020, around 16:26, the Defendant filed a child abuse report with AT agency on the ground that the Defendant left the vehicle parked with the victim for about 30 minutes on June 24, 2020.

3) Report of the third child abuse on September 23, 2020

On September 23, 2020, the head of a child-care center where the victim was the victim at around 11:18, the head of the child-care center, who had the victim, did not speak to the defendants, and visited the victim with a neighboring child of the child-care center. In general, in the case of a child of 15 months, the victim's body weight is at least 12 km, while the victim's body weight is at least 10 km, the body weight was reduced at 1 km compared to the transfer, and the body weight was reduced at 1 km, and there is no other nutritional condition, such as the sale bridge is divated, and the previous victim was the upper part of the victim around June 9, 202, and around July 9, 202, the child abuse was reported to the Seoul Police Station around September 23, 2020.

E. In the course of fostering the Defendants, the measures taken by the Defendants, such as a charnel to observe the victims

(i) Aggregates;

During the Defendants’ bringing-up process, the victims suffered a gap between the victim and the victim’s bringing-up aggregate on the left side (Swelman from June 2020), the upper thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth 200 to July 202), the right thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth, 9th thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth thalth, 10th thalth thalth thalth thalth stalth stalth stalth th th 10th th st.

(ii) Atlantic blood, such as a hole confirmed in the autopsy and appraisal report;

(a)the face, head, and title;

(1) 얼굴 외표 검사상 이마에서 수개의 피하출혈이 보이고, 오른쪽 눈 아래, 오른쪽 뺨, 왼쪽 턱뼈에서 피하출혈이 보이며, 양쪽 귓바퀴에서 작은 표피 박탈이 보이고 윗입술 상순 소대가 파열되었다.3)

(2) There seems to be a large number of hairs and small scarcitys from the two sides, such as the part of the head floor, the part of the back water, the part of both spectators, etc.

(3) At the end and right side of the outer sphering test, the spheroids appear to be seen from the left side of the upper center of the wood, and there appears to be a national spherical blood in front of the sampling for the internal spherical test.

B) Body b.

In the right side and right side side of the Helill, the helithal blood appears to be exposed to the upper side under the upper side of the right side of the Helill, and the helithal blood appears to be exposed to the upper side of the front side of the internal examination.

C) arms and legs;

(1) The blood transfusion appears to be from the upper part of the upper part of the outer part of the arms test, the left part of the west is seen to have several chests, and under the upper part of the arms inside the arms, the blood transfusion appears to have been made from the left part of the elbow.

(2) In the front of the right side of the outer bridge on the surface of the bridge and the left side of the bridge show a small sub-secting, and the right side of the bridge appears to have a wide range of sub-secting in the right side and solitary area.

(f) The attitude of the defendant against the victim;

1) On March 5, 2020, the Defendant left the victim (the victim was left alone for 3 hours and 54 minutes at the time) at his/her own residence, and left the victim alone for 30 minutes and 54 minutes from that time until August 5, 2020, including the victim’s negligence for 3 hours and 54 minutes from that time.

2) On CCTV images installed in AV elevator at around 16:37 on August 24, 2020, installed in AV broadcasting stations around AV, the fact that, so far as far as the Defendant was unable to get out of the victim, the Defendant was faced with the wall of the elevator, and the front part of the baby was pushed off by the Defendant with the loss of the baby while getting out of the elevator. On the CCTV images installed in the Defendant’s residential elevator at around 09:11 on September 14, 2020, around September 14, 2020, the victim was reduced from the Defendant’s left part and the victim was reduced from the elevator hand while the Defendant left the elevator, and then the victim was confirmed as being in need of the reduction of the victim’s neck by selling, and other similar images are confirmed.

3) On September 18, 2020, the Defendant stated that “AF social welfare worker by telephone calls, and “the victim does not listen well to the thmthm. It does not properly drink food. No matter how much it is possible to think of it. No matter how much we think it is. No matter how we think it is. The Defendant’s sound would incur food and drink.”

4) In this court’s testimony that “The Defendant, unlike other parents, was aware of, or did not have any way to see, the victim’s child-care center teacher P did not have any other parent.” First, considering the fact that she raisess a child and raises the victim, she saw that she would be different from what she would be. The victim was interested, first, that she did not look closely compared to her. The Defendant testified that she did not her child-care center’s adaptation period, she did not her her the victim, but she did not her the victim’s her ability to her, even while her child-care center adaptation period.”

G. The AJ message sent and received by the Defendants in the course of raising the victim

The Defendants provided and received the AJ message of the following contents in the course of raising the victim:

■ 2020. 2. 23. 00:37 경피고인 A: 오늘부터는 피해자가 콧물 남피고인 B: 허억피고인 A: 근데 그냥 두려고피고인 B: 앤 기침도 장난 같아■ 2020. 3. 4. 10:17 경피고인 A: 샘들이 안아주면 안 운다. 물론 일어서야 하지만피고인 B: 귀찮은 년피고인 A: 다음 주부터 오지 않아도 되겠대 ㅋㅋ■ 2020. 3. 6. 17:26 경피고인 A: 오늘 온종일 신경질. 사과 하나 줬어. 대신 오늘 폭력 안 썼다.피고인 B: 아침부터 그러더니 짜증이 갈수록 느는 거 같애피고인 A: 내때문이긴 한데 그래도 짝나■ 2020. 8. 21. 15:28경피고인 A: 내가 밥 준다고 할 때까지 얘는 굶는다.피고인 B: 개진상이야? 데리고 다니기 짱나니까 집에 둘래? 내가 집으로 갈께요.피고인 A: 집에 둘거니까 오지마■ 2020, 8. 25. 09:47경피고인 A: 너무 싫다. 억지로라도 하는 게 맞지만 이러다 화병 걸릴 거 같아피고인 B: 최대한 자기가 관여를 안 하고 내가 전담해서 나쁜 감정이 줄어드는지. 그렇다고 자기가꼴보기 싫은 것도 아니까 막 잘해주고 이런 거 말고 일단 당장의 필요만 채워주되 내가 하는 걸로TT■ 2020. 9. 15, 14:11경피고인 A: 애가 미쳤나 봄. 지금도 안 처먹네피고인 B: 걍 하루 종일 온전히 굶겨봐요■ 2020. 9. 17. 08:55 경피고인 A: 3일까지 굶어도 안 죽어피고인 B: 또 안 먹어? 뭔가 문제가 있다 정말피고인 A: 쌍욕 나오고 패고 싶은데 참는다.피고인 B: 씹는 거에 트라우마 생긴 건 아니겠지■ 2020. 9. 18, 14:24경피고인 A: 입안에 있는 음식물 빼내다가 물려서 피났거든피고인 B: 개도 아니고 진짜 우리가 넘 쉽게 생각했나봐피고인 A: 이러다 벌 받을까봐 걱정되고 무서워■ 2020. 10. 13. 09:54경피고인 A: 병원에 데려가? 형식적으로피고인 B: 그게 좋을 거 같아요ㅠ 자기가 번거롭겠지만ㅠ

(h) Statement by the defendant involved in bringing up the victim;

1) The Defendant’s wife stated at the investigative agency that “the Defendant made it difficult for the Defendant to see that he was able to see the Victim’s Doctrine after his adoption at the early stage of the adoption,” and the other individuals of the Defendant stated in the investigative agency that “I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see. I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to make an adoption. I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see the adoption.

2) 피고인의 지인은 수사기관에서 "피해자가 이유식을 먹는 데 걸리는 시간은 2~3분 정도이다. 뜨거운 이유식을 너무나 빠른 속도로 먹여 피해자가 울기도 하였다. 피해자가 입을 벌리면 음식이 들어가고 피해자가 컥컥거려도 등을 두들기면서 계속 빠르게 먹였다. 피고인의 첫째 딸이 계속 거슬리는 행동을 하니까 피고인이 '너 피해자 혼나는 거 봤지? 너 피해자 혼나는 것처럼 혼나 볼래?'라고 말하니 첫째가 겁에 질린 표정을 하고 말을 잘 들었다."고 진술하였다.

3) On March 2, 2020, the Defendant’s leader stated at an investigative agency that “If the Defendant did not look at the victim living in the Defendant, it would be said that he would be flick, and the victim’s intelligence would be flick, and at the present, the victim’s intelligence would be flick, and that he would not flick, while carrying out an act that must be flicked on the top of the mouth, and that he would not flick.” The Defendant stated that “The Defendant did not flick the victim and flicked the victim without the subject of flicking.”

(i) Various circumstances on the date of the victim’s death;

1) On October 13, 2020, the images taken on October 13, 2020, at around 08:34, 2020, the Defendant called “as soon as possible.” The floor as “as soon as possible” with the victim’s voice, and the Defendant is able to walk up the floor on several occasions, and it is confirmed that the shape of the Defendant is equal to the Defendant.

2) On Oct. 13, 2020, the image taken on Oct. 13, 2020, it is confirmed that the condition that the victim gets drinking without having food for reasons, and that the defendant said that the victim was "as soon as drinking" to be "as soon as drinking."

3) From the images taken on October 13, 2020 on October 13, 2020, the Defendant’s 09:02, “eat seat” refers to “eat seat” to the victim, and the Defendant, who did not drink the victim, was able to look at the victim’s Handphone, and was able to say that the victim would incur “hit” in this case.

4) On October 13, 2020, the Defendant’s trial money was confirmed from October 13, 2020 to 09:29:29 to 15 minutes of the video call between the Defendant and the Defendant. The video call was the first child with the Defendant’s trial money.

5) At around 2020, 10, 13. 09:45, the residents living on the following floor of the Defendants visited the Defendant when the vibration, which seems to have been set up a dump level at the Defendants’ house, continued repeatedly over 4 to 5 times. In this case, the Defendant neglected snow by stating that “the dump. ....... inside the cumpt,” and neglecting the snow.

6) On October 13, 2020, around 10:15, the Defendant moved to the first child to move to the childcare center, and returned to the house at around 10:32 on the same day. On the same day, around 10:42 on the same day, the Defendant was in the emergency room at around 11:06 on the same day, where the Defendant was in the house to move to the childcare center, and the Defendant was in the emergency room at around 10:48 on the same day.

7) The victim was in a taxi moving to the hospital and was in a state of leaving the taxi to be hidden at intervals of 30 seconds, and was unable to take normal respiratory measures.

8) On October 11, 2020, when the victim arrived at the L Hospital emergency room in the state of the heart, and around 11:11, October 13, 2020, when the first medical personnel implemented the first CPR, and at around 11:45 on the same day, the second CPR again occurred at the heart around 16:22 on the same day. The victim had the second CP and the second CP was the head of the heart at around 16:34 on the same day, but the second CP was the second CP, but the second CP was the heart at around 18:15 on the same day. While the medical personnel conducted the third CPR, the victim was unable to recover the second CP, and the victim died at the end at around 18:40 on the same day.

(j) The nature of the defendant and various circumstances to know the psychological conditions of the defendant on the day of the victim's death;

1) The Defendant was an acute and unsatisfying character, with the introduction of satisfy, and was consulted about about about 15 times by a counseling professor during the year 2019. On February 10, 2017, the Defendant was under counseling about 15 times by a counseling professor, and was under the mental and medical treatment from G with stress who was dismissed by satisfy.

2) The Defendant is an active tendency to engage in activities in at least 10 online Mamcar mar. While the Defendant was accompanied by a meeting to give information about adoption in the early adoption stage of the victim, there were many cases where the Defendant did not accompany the victim, but did not participate in the meeting with the chines.

3) Two neighboring residents of the Defendant stated at an investigative agency that “The Defendant Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine, Doctrine Doctrine, etc. Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine

4) The Defendant underwent a clinical assessment at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office on 2020, 12, and 2. As to the Defendant’s “principal character characteristics,” with respect to “the Defendant’s emotional and character is that the Defendant’s behavior or attitude is motiveed as having priority over meeting his/her own needs and as he/she wishes to obtain. Specifically, in the relationship where he/she is important, he/she withdrawal of a private and net response attitude, or in the case where he/she considers that he/she is the weak in the relationship with his/her ability or that there is no damage, it is highly likely that he/she may act without distance, such as displaying an appraisal without excessive expression. It is highly likely that he/she could have dismissed the victim against whom he/she could not resist, and accordingly, he/she evaluated it as the implications that the experienced stress experienced in the process of raising and interaction the victim tend to clearly display the victim.”

5) In the investigation before the claim against the Defendant, the Defendant’s statement and character appears to be “the fact that, as a result of the speculative inspection (Rorscach, etc.) and the multi-area personal examination (MPI-2), the Defendant appears to be trying to have a view to and interest in the surrounding people by participating in various social activities in a very strong way with strong desire for the assessment and recognition. The inherent self-esteem or self-esteem tend to maintain self-esteem through the complete and ideal form in a situation where it is recognized that it threatens self-esteem or self-assessment of value. The Defendant appears to have been able to be easily able to be seen as a threat of self-esteem or self-assessment. The need for a long period of time for evaluation and pointed out by others, and the Defendant appears to have been able to have an easy and negative attitude to reject the assessment and pointed out, and to have experienced and have been able to take more advantage of the nature of the Defendant’s overall society and to have experienced and have been able to take more advantage of the need of it.”

6) Around December 3, 2020, the Defendant stated that “the period of physiological saves, especially during the period of physiological savesty, and the emotional savesty was serious.” On November 30, 2020, Defendant B also stated that “the time when the Defendant was examined as a second time during the period of physiological saves,” and that “the first day of the physiological saves and second day of the birth saves, in particular, if the Defendant had to look at the Defendant’s eye and the second day of the birth saves.” The Defendant stated that “if the Defendant was found to have the eye, the fighting occurred frequently, and if the Defendant was erroneous, the saves that the Defendant sent and received the Defendant’s physiological saves on the Defendant’s physiological saves are the period of physiological saves to Defendant B.

7) At around October 13, 2020, the day of the victim’s death, the Defendant sent a AJ message to the Defendant, stating that “the Defendant was frighting to her fore and her fore, and her fore, the victim’s life.”

8) On December 3, 2020, the Defendant underwent an action analysis inspection at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office. On the day of the victim’s death, the Defendant responded to the question of assault against the victim by the behavioral analysis officer that “I am the same stude that he was fluored. No. 1. There was fluorous brut, stress, and the Audio brue brut, so that he could not brut. There was a brutous and brut brut brut brut, and there was no brut brut, but there was no brut brut that she returned to the brut.”

9) On October 13, 2020, immediately before the victim died, the Defendant stated that “the date of the death of the victim must be the day of the death of the victim,” and that “the date of the death of the victim must be the day of the death of the victim.”

(k) Opinions of experts on autopsy and appraisal reports and autopsy and appraisal reports of victims;

1) The victim’s death causes, etc. as a result of the autopsy and appraisal report

A) In the head of the complaint and the head of the registry, the length was 9cm, 3.5cm, 2.5cm, 1.5cm, and 1.5cm in the column, respectively, and the extraction was completely cut, and accordingly, the blood transfusion in large quantities and the wide range of dubing surgery are likely to have been caused. The victim’s private person is considered to have damaged the dubing part.

B) The fatal damage that appears to be the victim is deemed to have been caused by the history mainly.

C) An organizational inspection of the parts of the fatal damage, seen from the victim’s clothes, is deemed to have been in progress in part. Some of the long-term damage is presumed to have occurred more than the number of days of death, and it is difficult to completely exclude the possibility that the re-damage would have occurred on the parts of the parts already damaged.

2) Opinions on the autopsy report, etc. by professor V of law in medical science

A) Damage to an extract is very rare damage to the extent that it can account for 0.3% of the children’s credit. In order to cause damage to an extract, such as the victim, two actual parts of the extract, it must act in front of the ship, and shall act as pressure by spine located later than the extract. According to the medical thesis, damage to an extract by the force forward of the ship, in the case of children, it is assumed that a large bicycle is cut down in the future, and that it is caused by traffic accidents, etc.

B) The right to extract is, in itself, a damage that may cause extreme clothes and threaten life. Therefore, it is deemed impossible to walk normally while the right to extract has been defeasible.

C) In light of the formation, etc. of childcare organizations, it is reasonable to determine that the victim has already suffered damage due to the strong force inside the 3 to 7th day of death, and that the victim has suffered acute ties to the extent that it would cause the death of approximately 600 meters of her death.

D) In the event that the blood transfusion occurred due to a livered sporadd cloot during the period between three to seven days of death, it is reasonable to view that the flod clod clod clod clod clogs should be observed, and that the 600m clod flod clod clod clod clod clod clod clod clod clod clod clod clod clod 5) in the body size of the victim is fatal.

E) In general, cutting off of the 4 wave and extractions of the complaint and the ledger are caused by a very strong force in the body where it has been severely suspended. Therefore, there is a possibility that it may be caused by a strong power in a state fixed on one side, such as the complaint and the ledger.

3) Opinions of A0 medical specialists in the emergency department of La Hospital

A) The inter-chief heat of the president and the president cannot easily occur due to shock that occurs in their daily lives, and common sense is likely to have a strong external strength to the degree of traffic accidents.

B) In the case of darcts, the possibility of being damaged by external forces or shocks that occurred in front of the long-term transition of the body heading part is rare, and is damaged by direct shocks that occur in the place where the long-term transition is located. In the case of darcts, the complete cutting may occur when the child has a strong pressure, such as causing a strong pressure to the body, spreading back a new debt, or making it an object above.

C) In the event of a long-term spreading, it is difficult to lead a daily life, such as walking or drinking breadbing, etc., which causes a long-term in the inside of a pollutant with a high fluor.

D) When an extract is damaged, it is difficult to lead a daily life with the effect that the fire extinguishing efficacy flows and the internal organization flows and the internal organ is easily melted and the internal organ becomes able to become able to become able to become able to become able to become able to become entrified, such as bamboo

4) Opinion on the autopsy report, etc. by legal professionals W

A) From the autopsy of the victim, blood with more than 600 meters of her mouths in the mouth, and the wide range of her blood was observed. The blood dose of the victim 760 meters is 760 meters, and blood is rarely broken away. In the case of young children in very nutritional condition, it is impossible to maintain life if there is any actual blood. Accordingly, the direct cause of death of the victim is the blood transfusion.

B) The blood transfusions in the mouth led four strikes of the warden and the commander, and he could have dumpeded dump cutting.

C) Even though the livering blood, such as hole, is not observed on the surface of the ductal and the ductal body was shocked to the extent that the ductal and the ductal body was cut, it may be a ductal evidence that the victim took the ductal body and cut the ductal body. If the ductal body was taken by the ductalche, the ductal surface of the price chain and the ductal body of the ductal body of the ductal body may both lead to the homogeneity between the ductal body and the ductal body of the ductal body and may not cause any damage or ductalities.

D) From the perspective of autopsy, it is difficult for the victim to simultaneously cut the liver and panthesis due to one-time outbreak. At least two times of distribution, the victim is presumed to have been engaged in the livering and panthesis by force different from each other.

E) Considering as a result of the dynasium reaction around the extracting site, it is deemed that there was a shock in the dynasium even before the victim dies. When the extracting site is cut, the amount of fire leakage can cause opinions such as local dynasis, and if there is no opinion, it is less likely that the dynas cutting would have been done before the date of death.

F) The direct cause of death of the victim is the blood transfusion, and the intermediate event is the cutting of livers and extractings, and the main cause of death is the power to initiate the vessel by saluting.

5) Opinions on AW Chairperson AX’s autopsy and appraisal report, etc.

(a)It is presumed that force (for bluntce, drinking, shot, etc., force used to be specialized in guns, etc.) was removed by strong force in the following direction, leading up to duplicated cutting.

(B)It is thought that the estimated price ceiling is not protected by the bones of neutrons.

C) The use of any method is that the Defendant was the victim with a significant impact on the shock level caused by traffic accidents.

D) In a direct private person, the victim suffered arbitry cutting and damage to the collection and the collection of the register by drinking or salivating the body of the victim to the extent that the Defendant would have become aware of at the time of a traffic accident, etc., and the victim is deemed to have caused the death due to shock caused by a large amount of pacte, etc.

E) Many of the medical papers refer to the method of pricing, cutting off, or cutting down, etc., mainly by strong force, as well as to the causes of typical extracting damage.

4. Determination

A. As to the crime of violating the Child Welfare Act (Habitual child abuse)

The common issues of this part are whether the victim’s alley, etc. may occur without external appearance in his/her daily life. In light of the following: (a) the victim’s age, the victim’s primary rearer is the defendant; and (b) the time when the body was cut off, etc. was brought up at the Defendant’s home, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant’s price was the Defendant’s act.

1) The right-to-hand Written Abandonment (attached Form 1 No. 300,00 per annum)

In full view of the following circumstances recognized by the above facts and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the Defendant’s price buckbucks to the right side of the victim and found the victim’s abandonment to the right side.

A) The right thalone may occur when the upper stalone directly strings, or when the stalone stalone stalone stalone stalones or when the stalone stalone stalone stalone stalones or when the stalone stalone stalone stalone stalone staless

B) Ordinary children, unlike adults, are unable to take place so far as they do not have strong external capacity because they have a large composition of boness, unlike adults, or face with them.

C) In a case where the right-to-face abandonment is cut off, it seems that not only takes a considerable period of time for the victim to resist and recover sheshes, but also the victim’s appeal to considerable pains and cannot walk well during that period. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not receive treatment from the hospital by care of the victim.

(ii) approximately 7m m2 m2 (attached Form 1 No. 4 per annum)

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above-mentioned facts and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, the defendant's flive part of the victim's back head may be recognized as having been 7 cm up to the victim's back head.

A) If an infant who started to walk from the right to walk is in the right to walk on his/her own from the right to walk, it may occur when he/she goes to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to

B) In light of the fact that there was approximately 7 cm alley on the back side of the victim, the victim did not have any damage to the two mouths, such as the one-to-face transfusion or the one-to-explosive one, even though there was no damage to the victim, etc., the dub body of the victim caused the victim cannot be deemed to have occurred from the stairs, and the victim’s head seems to have suffered the price at a fixed state on the floor.

C) From 40 cm to 12 months after the birth, the brain of a child is formed entirely with the growth of the two organs and the formation and development of the bones of the head for a child of 1 year has already been completed. Therefore, there is a very little possibility that the two parts of the body may be cut off from the height of 40 cm to the upper bottom, or from the stairs, and the two parts of the body may be cut off.

D) It is difficult to see that the size of the frame is above approximately 7§¯ in daily life, and one of the doctors who treated the victim at L Hospital stated in the investigative agency that “dubs are cut off by normal credit and can not be caused by an absolute credit.”

3) To the right-hand walone abandonment (attached Table 1 No. 500,00 per annum)

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned facts and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, the fact that the defendant prices the victim's right side part at the victim's right side and the victim's right side abandonment was severed.

A) The right frame of abandonment may be at the price by directly receiving the pelvise and may also arise at the time of examining the ground in his hand while going beyond.

B) Generally, as a result of the decline in dunes composition of the bones upon the age of 20 years, it may occur easily due to ordinary behavior, such as satisfe when the aged becomes solid and when they are older than daily life. However, in the case of ordinary children, it is difficult for the victim to have a strong external strength if the dunes composition of the bones body is high, so it is difficult for the victim to suffer a dunes from a daily life, and if it leads to a dunes, it is difficult for the victim to suffer from a dunes. Therefore, the victim’s dunes of du

C) In light of the fact that the photographs attached to the autopsy test report has a somewhat large size of the victim's right elbows, the victim seems to have suffered the upper part of the right elbs of the victim by external force.

D) On September 17, 2020, the image taken by the victim around September 17, 2020 showed that the shape of the parts of the parts of the victim, compared to the victim’s left arms, has been confirmed as the body, and if the right-side abandonment is cut off, the victim complained of considerable pain and the use of the parts seems to have been limited. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not have the victim taken care of the hospital.

(iv) the 8th and 10th to the left, the 10th and the right 10th to the right, (attached Table 1 No. 6).

Comprehensively taking account of the above facts and the following circumstances recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it can be recognized that the defendant added up the 8th and the 10th 10th gate of the victim's left-hand side by pricing parts such as the victim's left-hand side and added up the 10th gate to the victim's right-hand side.

A) In general, the cage cage cage generally can be sageed by directly cutting off or cutting off the body body, and it is difficult for a child, who started to walk like the victim, to be in the position, to occur from being mixed or falling off in the course of daily life. In a case where a common child goes beyond or falls off, it is difficult to find out the cage of his/her hand and to find out his/her hand and to find the bage of his/her chest part, even if it may occur.

B) Ordinary children, unlike adults, have a large composition of the bones body and strong external strengths of the bones, cannot be said to have occurred unless they have a strong external strength. The victim’s dysium occurred, but most of the child’s dysiums were found to have been damaged by child abuse.

c) In particular, the 8th left-hand and the 10th th th th th thy that occurred to the victim would be the side after the th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th

D) In light of the fact that the victim’s blood transfusions can be confirmed under the victim’s right cage, from the photographs attached to the autopsy test report, the victim appears to have been cut to the right 10th cage by external force.

E) In the event of a cage cage cage, the victim seems to have been unable to raise his/her son due to pain, to properly cage his/her son, not to be sleeped or sound, and to have been slicked with his/her body. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not have the victim undergo medical treatment by bringing the victim to the hospital.

(v) the left-hand pelkes, etc. (attached Form 1 No. 7)

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above-mentioned facts and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the Defendant’s left-hand west of the victim’s left-hand gate is cut off by the victim’s face-hand gate, and the victim’s head gate was at the price of the victim’s head gate, and the victim’s head gate was inflicted on the victim’s head gate.

A) The left-hand pelkes may arise when the pelkes on the left-hand pelkes from the attitude pointing the arms towards their head.6)

B) The frameworks of the upper left-hand speaks that were generated by the victim appear to have a unique framework of the speaks. Such a frameworks are the forms of the speaks that were generated by strong external strengths, rather than by going beyond generally.

C) From the photographs attached to the autopsy test report, several standings are observed on the left left side of the victim, in light of the shape of the body and the degree of damage, etc., it seems to have occurred as compared to the standings.

D) The left-hand pelkes are the frameworks of parts that are difficult to generate in their daily lives.

E) In the head of a victim’s head, many damages, such as a hole, etc. are observed in two sides, such as a floor part, a water side part, a water side part, and a joints part of both pipes, and the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints. In particular, it is difficult

B. Regarding murdering

1) Whether the Defendant exercised a strong power, such as taking the victim’s clothes, etc.

A) Possibility of the occurrence of panping and livering livers where the Defendant scams the victim;

In full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to view that a woman of approximately 168 cm with the Defendant was satisfed by satching about 9kg in body, and that satisfed by satching or satisfing off the body.

(1) In order to cut dye by shocking the bones on the side of the other side, the victim’s bones is not a vertebral body inverte so that the bones should be cut together; there is no possibility that the bones might be cut back by side while looking at the fry in the location of dyke, and there is no possibility that the bones and tacks might be cut off by side; and it is difficult to generate dye or mack sye because the bones and tacks play the role of absorbing the shock.

(2) In the event that the Defendant’s winter-type 86 km similar to the victim’s death, weight 9.05 km from the Defendant’s winter-type 150 km, the Defendant’s winter-type 150 km, the Defendant’s winter-type 5 times, and the Defendant’s winter-type 86 km-type 150 km, the Defendant’s winter-type 5 times, as a result of the above experiment, seems to be difficult to face the victim’s side by first.

(3) Since the utilization ratio of the young children, such as the victim, in the mouths of the young children is high, and the light is lower than the pansty or livers, it is a prolonged period that can be damaged first during the fall day, and there is no damage among the victims.

(4) In the medical thesis, etc., the possibility of undermining the right of extract due to the day-to-day height fall below the normal height is rare, and when there is any damage to the right of extract, the possibility of intentional damage should be raised strongly.

B) Possibility that panish cutting and livering liver during the CPR against the Defendant’s victim may occur

In full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s CPR process against the victim was either extracted or livered.

(1) In the case of adults, there is a case where the boness of boness during the CPR arise, but in the case of children, it is difficult to generate the boness of boness due to the high gravity of boness in the case of children.

(2) In the paper of medicine, etc., when an infant died of an abstract damage, it may be suspected that the CPR was damaged by abuse rather than due to a sudden abortion or the CPR’s cause, and there was no CPR’s damage.

(3) An abstract is a long-term and long-term liverer located below the center and is located below the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center of the center.

(4) In order to cut off a long-term extracter or to generate liverer heat, strong external powers, such as considerable shock, are required on the part of the body, and such damage is difficult to occur due to the external strength of general CPR.

C) Possibility that the first child of the defendant is beyond sofaculation and is likely to result in panping and livering livers by taking the parts of the victim's clothes;

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is difficult to deem that the first child of the defendant was crypted from the sofa, and that the defendant’s child was crypted by extracting the victim’s clothes, cutting, or livering.

(1) On the following floor of the Defendants testified in this Court that “A witness S, at around 09:40 on October 13, 2020, had a serious vibration, such as the time when the injured party has lowered a dump bell used at a health club, repeated on 4-5 occasions, which differs from that of the son,” and that this differs from that of ordinary son. The Defendant’s shot machine, which made a video call on the day of the Defendant, did not see the Defendant’s first child in the investigative agency. In light of the aforementioned testimony, it appears that the Defendant’s first child was not set up in the dump on the day when the injured party died.

(2) In light of the characteristics, strength, etc. of arcts or livers, arcts or livers may occur when at least 50 km persons with a weight of 50 km or more take the arcts of the victim’s clothes. The first child of the defendant is an infant with about 44 months at the time, whose body weight was over about 14 km, and the first child of the defendant was over 14 km, and even if the first child of the defendant took the arcts of the victim, it is difficult to cause arcts or livers by the victim even if the victim took the arcts of the victim’s arcts in height.

(3) It is difficult to understand the Defendant’s first child’s act of disclosure of the victim’s clothes in her face to her face from a sofarcion, and the Defendant also mentioned it immediately after the victim’s death, but did not claim it even though it was a defense that is easily exempted from criminal liability.

D) Possibility of causing panping and livering livers by exercising strong power, such as initiating the victim by the defendant;

Comprehensively taking account of the above facts and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, insofar as the possibility of the occurrence of the grounds alleged by the Defendant that the Defendant had a strong ability to rescue the victim’s clothes after the victim’s death to this court is all excluded, it may be acknowledged that the Defendant had a strong power to rescue the victim’s clothes, such as taking the victim’s clothes, and taking the victim’s clothes. In addition, in the case of other causes where the Defendant could have a strong power to rescue the victim’s clothes, it is impossible to think of any other reason ordinarily likely to occur from the Defendant’s house, and further, it is difficult to suspect the possibility of the occurrence thereof.

(1) If the parts of the victim were to be sold due to different equipment, etc., the external damage, such as the part of the victim, should be observed. Damage, such as a hole, etc., is not observed in the part of the victim. Therefore, it is reasonable to deem that the part and the part of the victim’s clothes and the part of the victim’s clothes were placed in the part of the victim’s body due to the same Defendant’s loss or power.

(2) Around September 22, 2020, the Defendant was in a situation in which it was difficult for the Defendant to have a strong power to cut off the victim's extractions or to cut off the livers, because he was driven by the Defendant at the time of the victim's death or to use heavy things to the extent that he could not have been able to do so, and thus, the Defendant did not have the ability to set the part of the victim's body by hand.

(3) An extract cutting or liver spores shall occur when a strong external force is taken. In the case of a victim, the force of an extract so that an extract is cut to two parts, such as the victim, must act in front of the course, and pressure by spine located later than an extract. In the case of a victim, it is reasonable to deem that the victim’s hair is clearly identified as an spores, in light of the following: (a) since the victim’s diversity is observed, such as at least four strings and tears, etc., the strong force of the victim is in the forward part of the course; (b) the victim is highly likely to have taken place; and (c) an abstract cutting or spores from spores, without other organs, is cut off. In particular, it is difficult to occur in the event that an spores from spores are prices for drinking, and it mainly follows spores. 9)

(4) 피해자의 대장에는 천공도 발생하였는데, 일반적으로 대장에 천공이 발생하려면 손에 의한 외력보다는 강한 힘이 필요하기 떄문에 발에 의하여 외력이 가해졌다고 보는 것이 합리적이다.

2) Whether the victim’s dump cutting and liver heat occurred on the date of the victim’s death

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above-mentioned facts and the evidence duly selected and investigated by this court, it can be recognized that the victim's arbitrative cutting and arbitrative marization was caused on the date of death.

A) On October 13, 2020, on the day of the victim’s death, the image taken around 08:34 on October 13, 2020, it is confirmed that the victim walk and the defendant move to. The abstract mar is in itself a very heavy single, and as a damage that threatens the life, it is generally impossible to walk in the state of extracting and spreading to the blood, and even in the case of a long-term mar fever, it is difficult to lead a daily life such as walking or drinking boom due to the blood transfusion.

B) In the case of the victim, it is deemed that the victim suffered from shock from shocks before the death, such as the arct and the surrounding organ being somewhat vague, and the blicks are observed in the surrounding area, and the arbitr was damaged. However, in light of the fact that the arctr caused by fire leakage did not observe and that the arctr was not absorption of the arctr, it appears that the victim’s arctal cutting on the date of death.

C) In light of the fact that a large volume of blood transfusions occur and result in the short-term death, and that the form of the red blood cells observed in the blood of the victim appears to be acute blood transfusions, it is reasonable to deem that the liver heat of the victim caused the death on the date of the death.

D) On October 13, 2020, when the residents of the lower floor visit the Defendant due to noise problems around 09:45 on October 13, 2020, in a case where the victim’s livers softened so that they were suffering from blood, then the victim’s livered sofarcing may appear in a situation where there is no awareness of the victim due to low-blood shock around 10:38.

E) In blood test conducted around 11:20 on October 13, 2020, immediately after the victim was transmitted to a L hospital, the victim blood pH was not more than 6.5, and was ordinarily lower than the average value of ordinary adults or children, the average value of the pH7.3, which is the average value of ordinary adults or children. In light of such pH value, the victim appears to have been in a situation where the disease had not been pulmon or unstable before the clerical error in the hospital. Moreover, the hH value of the hmogle was considerably lower than 12, the average value of the hmogle as 6.2.

3) Whether the Defendant had attempted to murder

Comprehensively taking account of the above facts and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant strongly taken the part of the victim’s clothes for about 16 months, with no ability to defend himself/herself, and that he/she was sufficiently aware or predicted that the victim’s clothes may result in the death of the victim if he/she took the part of the victim’s clothes strongly due to the location of an important long-term period in maintaining his/her life on the part of the uniforms. Therefore, even if the Defendant did not have a conclusive intention to kill the victim, it can be deemed that there was a negligence of murder at least even if he/she did not intend to do so.

A) The circumstances leading to the commission of murder and the motive for the commission of murder

(1) The Defendant was under great stress due to the suspicion of child abuse and repeated reports of child abuse against the adopted children. From around 2020, 7, 17 around September 22, 2020 to around 200, the Defendant took care of the victims at home without sending the victims to the childcare center, and had accumulated childcare stress on the victims at home. The Defendant abused the victims continuously for about four months from June 2020 to October 12, 2020, due to the loss of the victims who are adopted and do not have to play in mind at the first level of their children.

(2) On September 22, 2020, the Defendant seems to have been suffering from physical pains caused by the breast sex surgery, labor for the victim who does not drinked well, psychological apprehensions that occurred during the period of physiological, and that he was aware that he would be subject to reporting of child abuse again, and on the day of the instant crime, he seems to have been suffering from labor against the victim.

(3) On April 14, 2021, the Defendant stated that “The previous stress was accumulated, that it was a physiological period, and that the report was made, as the Defendant continued to know about whether it was made, and that there was no food that was made by the Defendant, and that it was fluent for various complex reasons.”

B) The state of the victim at the time of committing the crime

(1) The victim was a 16-month baby with height of about 79cm and 9.5km in weight, and was in a situation where it was difficult to escape or defend himself/herself without any other person’s aid. As a nutrition situation is not good, the body weight was remarkably small compared to the child of the same age.

(2) The victim had already been suffering from the Defendant’s harmful act such as the 8th left and the 10th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th st st st st st st st st st, the left st st st st st st st st st

C) the nature and repetition of the attack;

(1) The Defendant, who had no ability to flee by himself, and had already been in a state of health, and had an important long-term period of time taken care of the victim’s body, which was in a state of secret outflow due to the lack of health condition.

(2) In a case where the cutting of livers and panscopic scopher and panscopic scophers took place one time, the panscopic scophers or scophers should be cut or cut together with the panscopic scophers or scophers, and in the case of the victim, the scophers or the scopirs

(3) Even before the death of the victim, the Defendant prices the body of the victim, and even if the victim had already suffered damage to the extractment, the Defendant again taken the body of the victim’s happiness.

D) Possibility of the occurrence of death, objective situation before and after the commission of the crime

(1) Most of the long-terms that play an important role in maintaining human life are concentrated on the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part

(2) As indicated in attached Table 1, No. 1, 3, and 4, the Defendant assaulted the victim to undergo treatment at the hospital at all except for the left-hand flick aggregate, the right-hand fl, the right-hand 9th fl, the right-hand flick, and the rear flick.

(3) At around 09:50 on October 13, 2020, the Defendant did not take relief measures, such as sending the victim to a hospital in a timely manner, even in the situation where the awareness of the victim has been deteriorated due to dynassis caused by dynassis cutting and synassis, and left the first child to a child care center without leaving the victim mixed. On October 13, 2020, the Defendant moved the victim to the hospital without reporting it to the 119th, even if the victim lost his awareness.

(4) On the day of the victim’s death, R of taxi engineer between the Defendant and the victim on the day of the victim’s death, made a statement at an investigative agency that “the Defendant was aware of the victim’s unafford face, and did not urge the Defendant even though the vehicle was obstructed. If the Plaintiff was in such a state, then the Defendant was thought that he would have lost her gender if he was an ordinary sium.” The Defendant reported 119 when the Defendant was working at a hospital with the 119 first medical service workers and the victim, and confirmed that the recording file in which the Defendant was in conversations with the 119 first medical service workers and the Defendant was infford with the 119 first medical service workers, even though he was infford with the 119 first medical service workers and the 119 first medical service workers.

(5) 피고인은 2020. 10. 14. 14:32경 지인에게 "부검결과 잘 나오게 기도부탁해."라는 AJ 메시지를 보내기도 하였고, 피고인들의 가족이 출연한 TV 영상을 보고 연락한 지인에게 2020.10.14. 14:31경 "스쳐 지나감 ㅎㅎ"라는 AJ메시지를 보내기도 하였다.

Reasons for sentencing

1. Defendant A

After the decision to permit the adoption of a victim became final and conclusive, the Defendant began to habitually abandon or neglect the victim on the ground of his own flag and wife, including parenting stress, etc., and the victim was habitually abused not only emotional abuse against the victim, but also habitually committed physical abuse against the victim, and the victim was forced to die due to an act that makes it impossible for the victim to do so, such as taking the victim's clothes strongly due to his own idea. The victim had a shot trace of physical harm, such as physical abuse caused by the Defendant's physical abuse at the time of his death, and the autopsy of the victim had experienced so far. In light of the circumstances leading up to the death of the victim until his death, the victim was seriously damaged to the extent that he could not find the case due to the Defendant's physical abuse, such as the Defendant's physical abuse. In light of the circumstances leading up to the death of the victim, the victim was unable to find the case due to the Defendant's mental suffering and the Defendant's mental suffering from the harmful act.

Therefore, the Defendant, who was the subject of protection and rearing through the instant crime, rather is a cruel mental and physical harmful act against one’s adopted victim. As such, the Defendant committed the instant crime. As such, the Defendant: (a) committed the instant crime with heavy anti-humanity and anti-social characteristics; (b) and (c) led to the shock and loss of the victim to the large number of people, who are in a state of de facto blocking social protection due to one’s adoption and unable to defend or avoid any danger; and (c) rather than respect and protect the victim with personality for eight months or 16 months, who was in a state of de facto blocking social protection due to one’s adoption, and cannot defend or avoid any danger, the Defendant committed abandonment, neglect, physical and emotional abuse according to one’s own mind. Therefore, the Defendant’s crime of this case is deemed to be the object and object of the Defendant’s murder, and thus, the Defendant’s crime of this case is deemed to be a non-human crime that establishes human dignity and value guaranteed by all human beings.

Considering the above circumstances and the criminal defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it is reasonable to hold the defendant accountable for the crime of this case committed in an indefinite isolation from the ordinary society and to have the defendant an opportunity to thoroughly witness his/her mistake. Thus, the defendant shall be sentenced to punishment as ordered by the order.

2. Defendant B

(a) Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one month to seven years;

(b) Scope of recommendations based on the sentencing criteria;

1) 1 crime of violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abandonment)

[Determination of Punishment] Arrest, Confinement, Abandonment, or Abuse 02. A. General Criteria (Type 2)

[Special Aggravationd Persons] Aggravationd: Where the degree of organic abuse is more severe;

[Recommendation and Scope of Recommendation] Aggravation, 1 year to 2 years of imprisonment

2) 2nd crime [Violation of the Child Welfare Act (Child Abuse)]

[Determination of Punishment] Arrest, Confinement, Abandonment, and Abuse. A. General Criteria (Type 2)

【Special Convicted Person】

[Recommendation and Scope of Recommendations] Basic Field, Imprisonment of 6 months to 1 year and 6 months;

3) Type 3 (Child Welfare Violation (Child’s Abandonment))

[Determination of Punishment] Arrest, Confinement, or Abandonment Abuse 02. A. General Criteria (Type 2)

【Special Convicted Person】

[Recommendation and Scope of Recommendations] Basic Field, Imprisonment of 6 months to 1 year and 6 months;

4) Extent of recommendation according to the standards for handling multiple crimes: One year to three years (the first crime maximum + the second crime maximum + 1/2 + 1/3 of the third crime maximum).

(c) Determination of sentence;

There are extenuating circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment.

However, as a part of the victim, the defendant lives together with the defendant A and the victim, and was in a position to know who is more likely to be able to know about the victim's attitude of fostering the defendant A and the victim's status, and only makes it impossible to understand that the defendant was unaware of the abuse of the defendant A from the investigative agency to this court. Although the defendant had already been reported three times or three times on child abuse, the defendant did not confirm the specific facts from the defendant A or take any measures to protect the victim, and did not look closely at the victim's speech, but did not take any measures to protect the victim, and rather did not take any measures to confirm the facts from the defendant A or to protect the victim, it seems that the defendant was able to be subject to criticism against the defendant A for a long time while looking at only the part of the defendant A, and even if the defendant had a duty to protect the victim, it constitutes an element of sentencing unfavorable to the defendant.

Considering such circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it appears that if the Defendant avoided the Defendant’s abusive acts of Defendant A or took appropriate relief measures, such as medical treatment, it would have been possible to prevent the victim’s death. In particular, even though the head of the victim’s child care center immediately before the victim’s death was urged the victim to explain the aggravated health condition of the victim and to leave the victim to the hospital, it is inevitable for the Defendant to impose a more severe punishment on the Defendant by refusing such appeal, given that it is inevitable for the Defendant to impose a more severe punishment against the Defendant, beyond the scope of the above recommended punishment as set forth in the sentencing guidelines, and shall be determined as the order beyond the aforementioned recommendation range.

Judgment on the request for a probation order and an attachment order

1. A summary of the cause of the claim;

Since it is recognized that a person who has filed a request for an attachment order and a person who has filed a request for a probation order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is likely to recommit murder and commit a murder, it is necessary to attach an electronic device to his/her body to confirm his/her location by tracking his/her criminal conduct and put him/her on probation from the time the execution of the sentence is completed

2. Determination

A. Relevant legal principles

Article 5(3) and subparagraph 3 of Article 21-2 of the Act on the Attachment, etc. of Electronic Devices refers to a probable probability that the risk of recommitting a homicide is insufficient solely on the basis of the possibility of recommitting the crime, and that there is a probable probability that the defendant would de facto injure the legal peace by committing the homicide again in the future. The existence of the risk of recommitting a homicide shall be objectively determined by comprehensively assessing various circumstances, such as the defendant’s occupation and environment, the conduct prior to the crime, the motive, means, circumstances after the crime, the situation after the crime, and the appearance, etc., and such determination shall be based on the time of the judgment in the future (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2018Do7658, Jul. 658, 2018; 2018Do54, May 54, 205, 2018; 2018Hun-Ga

B. Determination

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record in light of the foregoing legal doctrine, it is difficult to readily conclude that the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone is highly probable to injure the legal peace of the Defendant by committing murder again in the future.

① As a result of the assessment of the risk of Korean-style criminal offenders (KORAS-G), the risk of recidivism is 8 points intermediate. As a result of the assessment of PC-R on the defendant, the risk of recidivism due to the qualitative characteristics of mental disorder is 20 points.

② There is no record that the Defendant committed the murder before committing the instant crime. Although the Defendant committed the instant murder, it was committed by the Defendant, while raising the victim, the Defendant killed the victim by the other dolus negligence while raising the victim. It appears to have occurred in a specific relationship with the victim, and the Defendant did not commit the instant murder against many unspecified victims.

③ Since the Defendant ordered the completion of a child abuse treatment program by an incidental disposition along with the sentence of imprisonment for life, it seems that the Defendant’s character and conduct is corrected through the enforcement of the above sentence and the incidental disposition, thereby lowering the risk of recidivism.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the request for the attachment order of this case and the request for the probation order of this case are without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Articles 9(4)1 and 21-8 of the Electronic Monitoring, etc. Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge or higher judge;

Judge Lee Jae-in

Judges fixed-term

1) The term “pro rata” means the order from the smaller side among 100 infants of the same age as that of the same gender.

2) In U’s testimony that “the cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage

3) The U witness who examined the victim testified in this Court that “The upper and upper end of the string of the Victim is a characteristic opinion of child abuse. It is a well tearing part at the time of the appearance. It is a damage which is a great doubt of child abuse.”

4) A witness, who is a legal medical practitioner, testified in this Court that “W appears to be a chain, such as the above pulmone-Stoke and to be generated at the time of human death.”

5) Generally, a child is presumed to have a blood of approximately 75-80 meters per body in the body, and if the weight is 9.5 km, the total blood quantity is presumed to be 150-800 meters in the body.

6) He testified in this Court that “In the case of a victim, the head of the shoulder bed in the case of the victim,” and that the head of the shoulder bed in the situation where the chest is unsatisfying and the satisfy is unsatisfying and the satisfy is difficult to cause the above satisfy.”

(vii) means the end of the boness abutting on the bones end of the bones;

8) Legal scholars W have a method of drinking in order to bring an extract cutting and livering to a son. In the case of drinking, it is necessary to keep the arms from the end to the end to the end to the end to the end to the end to the end to the end, and it is necessary to have the external strength to lower the end to the lower end to the end to the end to the end to the end to the end. In the case of unloading to the hand floor, it is necessary to have the arms much higher than the head to the lower end to the end. In a situation where the Defendant complained of pains after the chest operation, it is doubtful whether it may be difficult to price an dump cutting and liver to the extent that it may cause livering to the upper end to the end to the end to the lower end to the end.”

9) A witness V, who is a professor of legal science, has to tear in this Court, rather than thought, “the so-called so-called so-called “the so-called so-called so-called string,” in this Court, there was no doubt that he would have to tear. In this case, he testified that, if the so-called so-called string would have teared, he would be at the time when he would have teared. The reason is prohibited from being taken out in sports such as shooting. This is because there is a possibility that the so-called string would have to tear if he would be taken out in a fixed state such as shooting. Therefore, it would not be impossible to tear the so-called string, and it would be difficult or difficult to do so. In this case, he testified that the so-called stringing process would have been more likely to have been taken by the so-called string.”

10) U testified in this Court that “The serious tear to the degree of death is presumed to have occurred on the day of death, because it is difficult for the victim to have long teared so that it can be seen that it would be difficult to have long teared in a very large condition due to a well-fluoral flash, so it would be difficult for the victim to do so.”

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.