Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates a juvenile game hall in the name of "E" on the Do, 1, and 2nd floor in Bupyeong-si, Busan Metropolitan City.
A person who intends to produce or distribute a game product for the purpose of distributing or providing for use a game product shall obtain a rating on the contents of the game product concerned from a member of the game product class prior to the production or distribution of such game product.
Nevertheless, the defendant from September 15, 2015 to the same extent.
C. On the 21st day of the month, the game “F”, which was not classified by the rating, was provided to unspecified customers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness G;
1. A criminal investigation report (a statement by a telephone of an employee of the Game Rating Board);
1. A reply to each fact-finding inquiry;
1. Juvenile game providing business operator registration certificate;
1. On-the-spot photographs and character photographs [the defendant's defense counsel, the above "F" game machine connects ice francs with which the CDs can be printed to the "H" game machine, which had been offered for use according to the previous rating classification, and thus there was no need to be re-classified of rating classification. The defendant asserts that there was no intention since he believed the horses of the representative director G of the game machine providing company's "test game products for experiment" and provided them for the use of the above game machine.
According to the above evidence, “F” game machine is a game machine with more than 270 images changed in the screen and more than 270 games added in addition to the existing “H” game machine, and thus, it cannot be deemed as the same game machine as “H,” and therefore, it should be classified as “F” game machine.
In addition, the representative director G of a "F" game machine providing company refers to the defendant's "test game material" as provided in Article 21 (1) 3 of the Act on the Promotion of the Digitalcom Game Industry.
The answer to the question of “I” is the fact that the answer was made.