Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall be confiscated by Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a “F Game” in his own Government, and Defendant B is a person who conducts money exchange in accordance with Defendant A’s instructions, sends promotional text messages to customers, and provides customers with meals, coffee, etc.

1. No person who violates the Game Industry Promotion Act due to a violation of rating classification shall provide game water for use, the contents of which are different from those of the rating;

From March 30, 2016 to April 7, 2016, the Defendants conspired to commit a game “F” in the “F Game,” and the facts were classified as a class to obtain points when they are able to take out when they are scroped by hanging a container using the launcher, but approximately 40 “Crobe” game machine installed at approximately 10,000 won if many unspecified customers put 10,000 won in the said game machine, and the game began to proceed until 10,000,000 won automatically from the beginning of the game. As a result, according to the appearance of the 5th class to the beginning of the crop, such as the crop, it was possible to obtain a full score from 5 to 120,000 won.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game water different from the content of the rating classification.

2. No person who violates the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry due to money exchange shall exchange any tangible or intangible outcome obtained through the use of game water;

The Defendants conspired to provide many unspecified customers with game water at the time, time, and place specified in the above paragraph (1), and exchanged the points obtained according to the pictures such as ancient and melting them by calculating them as 1 won per point, and deducted 10% exchange fees if they are more than 100,000 won.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange the results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements are 1.1.