logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고단3517
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

【Defendant A and B】 The Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months.

However, between two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one shall distribute or provide game water of a content different from those classified by the Game Water Management Committee for the use of a game product for public offering by Defendant A, B, or C;

Defendant

A and Defendant B provided a game machine, such as “H” and “I,” which was classified as the general usage of the game in the Incheon area from February 2018, and provided a program, the opening and altered so that there exists a separate settlement window different from the rating classification, which was provided by the J, which is a game water developer, to distribute the game products not classified by the method of connecting the said game machine, and requested Defendant C to install the program.

On March 29, 2018, at around 00:00, the Defendants installed 30 games in the L Gameland in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, K 2, the 20th and the 30th of the “H” games. Defendant A provided a dog/ modified program delivered by the J of the developer, Defendant B introduced the proprietor of the “L Gameland” and provided the location and main body of the game machine to install the game machine by introducing the proprietor of the “L Gameland”. Defendant C stored the program transmitted by the Defendant A in the Nowon-gu, and linked the game machine to the game machine. Defendant C operated the opening and altered program by inserting the game machine. In addition, Defendant C added a signal to four instances inside the main body of the game machine and caused a croud and a settlement window.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to distribute game water different from the rating in the Game Water Management Committee.

2. Defendant D, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), knew that Defendant C installed a game product different from that of the game product classified by Defendant C, he participated in the installation of the game product in a manner that connects the IMO and PC inside the main body of the game machine to the distribution of the game product according to Defendant C’s instruction.

Accordingly, the defendant could facilitate the distribution of game products that were not classified as Class A, B, and C.

arrow