logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.28 2014나2011336
입회금 반환
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim as to the above cancellation part is dismissed.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The court's explanation on this part is based on the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the corresponding part except for the following parts of the judgment of the court of first instance.

[Supplementary Use] Part 16 of Part 2, " from the Plaintiff on Nov. 29, 2007," is as follows from the Defendant on Nov. 29, 2007:

as described in paragraph (2) of this section.

A. The sixth table 1 shall be made as follows:

every day shall be comprised of full-time non-members on February 2006, 564 (564) - Full-time members on August 2006 (564) - Full-time members on February 2007, 396 (564) - Full-time members on February 2007, 1,054 remaining 1,054 of full-time members on board as ordinary members (1,054), during the week in which full-time trading rights are granted, the number of full-time regular members on November 207, the number of full-time regular members on May 3, 2008 (74), the number of full-time regular members on May 1, 207, the number of full-time regular members on May 27, 2008, the number of full-time regular members on which 45 of full-time regular members are given, the number of full-time regular members on May 2, 2007 (14 main trading).

every 9th day to 6th day of the 9th day (based on recognition)

w. The plaintiff's assertion that "the ground for recognition of the head of the Gu" has no dispute, Gap's evidence 1 through 6, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, and Gap evidence 8-1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 21, 23, 25, 32, 38, 39, Eul's evidence 3, 5, 6, 8, and 11, and the whole purport of oral argument" is "the plaintiff's assertion that "the plaintiff shall be entitled to preferential membership when holding two general membership rights and additionally paying 300 million won in accordance with the defendant's instruction."

arrow