beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power” On March 24, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on November 29, 2010. On July 13, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment for a crime of attempted special larceny, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 15, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】 The Defendant, in collusion with D, prepared a false charter contract as if he leased F apartment Nos. 102, 304 to G, Nowon-gu, Seoul, which is the Defendant’s internal female E, and received a loan as security.
1. On March 15, 2012, the Defendant entered “E” in the lessor column of the apartment charter contract form located at the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, with the seal of E in advance, and D asked G, one’s own female, to “IB, with no operating funds in the name of JB, making it possible to use the operating funds by receiving a loan of security deposit in the name of JB station.” After requesting G to the above I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, the Defendant signed “G” in the lessee column of the said lease contract.
Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with D to forge a set of apartment lease contract in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. On March 27, 2012, the Defendant, along with D and G, presented that, at the point of the number of the victim bank located in the area of each Dong-gu in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant, applying for a loan of her spact loan from the Korean bank, he/she falsely prepared the said lease contract, as if it were the pre-contract, which was a genuine pre-contract.
Accordingly, the suspect used a forged private document in collusion with D.
3. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in paragraph 2, did not have leased apartment owned by G as above, but did not lease apartment owned by G, and as if G leased apartment owned by E, he did not follow the forged lease contract, and went to the victim bank from the victim bank.