logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.02.15 2018고단1386
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for five months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Public invitation for criminal conduct] The Defendants are legally married, and from around 2013 to the Incheon Seo-gu, Incheon, a real estate investment failure, operator, etc. while operating a "D Beauty" room, etc., the Defendants conspired to open a mobile phone in the name of E using the resident registration certificate, etc. of Defendant B, who was living together with ordinary places, to use it as business funds, etc.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Forgery of private documents related to the victim F, uttering of falsified investigation documents, and fraud;

A. On November 28, 2013, the Defendants forged private documents and display the falsified Private Document, and signed E without authority, stating “E”, “E”, “H, resident registration number column,” and “E” in the column of the amount of loan agreement, with the aim of exercising the right to file an application for the loan, using a mix in the form of loan transaction contract by the Credit Business Company F with the intent of exercising the right to file an application for loan.

At around that time, the Defendants continued to use the forged loan transaction contract as if they were duly formed by facsimile at the management office of the D Beauty shop in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, by submitting the forged loan transaction contract to an employee of the above F who is unaware of the forgery.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit the act of forging and exercising one copy of the loan transaction contract in the name of E, a private document on the rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendants filed an application for a loan under the name of E, and the Defendants filed an application for a loan under the name of E, even if they did not have the intent or ability to pay the loan normally, Defendant B was able to act as if they were E and called to the victim company, and Defendant A filed an application for a loan by submitting a forged loan transaction agreement as described in the above paragraph (a).

arrow