1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 10, 2005, the Plaintiff was appointed as a police officer and served at the B police station, etc. from around February 10, 201, and served as traffic safety agencies and traffic patrol personnel at the B police station. From around February 10, 201, the Plaintiff received education on service on board from the 14th to February 22, 201 of the same month among the education on service at the C police agency and the traffic patrol personnel scheduled from March 14 to 10, 2011.

나. 원고는 2012년경 피고에게, 2011. 2. 14.부터 2011. 2. 22.까지 받은 싸이카 승무교육(이하 ‘이 사건 교육’이라 한다)으로 ‘제4-5요추간 수핵탈출증’이 발병하였다면서 이를 공무상 부상에 해당한다고 주장하며 공무상 요양 승인 신청을 하였으나, 피고는 2012. 4. 5.경 원고에게 “제출된 한림대학교 성심병원 의무기록지(2011. 2. 23.)에 의하면 ‘일주 전 야구하다 삐끗, 7~8년 전, 3~4년 전에도 동일 증상 있어 근육이완제 투여 ’ 등으로 기록된 점으로 볼 때 상병 계기가 상이하고, MRI 판독결과 등을 미루어 볼 때도 원고의 증상은 퇴행성 변화에 기인한 것으로 보일 뿐 상병 당시 근무상황만으로는 발병 계기가 될 수 없다는 것이 의학적 소견임. 따라서 원고의 질병은 평소 지병에 기인한 것으로 보여지므로 공무와 상당인과관계가 있다고 보기 어렵다”는 이유로 공무상 요양 불승인처분을 하였다.

Although the Plaintiff filed a request for review against the above disposition, the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee dismissed the said request on July 31, 2012.

C. On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiff continuously obtained the instant education from the Defendant to the right hump, resulting in pains to the instant hump, and received treatment 18 times throughout 18 times, and the instant injury was alleged to constitute an injury in the line of duty, and applied for approval of medical care in the line of duty. However, on March 3, 2014, the Defendant claimed that the instant injury constituted an injury in the line of duty.