logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.03.29 2017구단28337
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuits, the Plaintiff applied for medical treatment for official duties on February 6, 2016, “the tear of half-yearly shotum.”

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. While serving as a civilian military employee in charge of the maintenance of heavy equipment in the 90 Maintenance Group B Maintenance Group of the 3rd Forces of the Army, the Plaintiff went to the hospital due to aggravation of knee knee knee gel gele. At that place, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at a certain point of “mae gnee of mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae mae (hereinafter “the instant injury”)” (hereinafter “the instant injury”). On April 12, 2016, the physical force measurement place at the 3rd Army Support Headquarters of the 3rd Army, while working as one of the physical force measurements, and applied for the approval of the Defendant for the medical treatment for official duties by asserting that mae mae mae mae gel gel gel gel fe fe fe gel.

B. On February 21, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision on non-approval (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s video (MRI) reading results, and on the ground that it is judged that the instant injury or disease was caused, or that the injury or disease was rapidly aggravated due to the circumstance alleged by the Plaintiff, or that there was no other materials to deem that the injury or disease was caused due to a reason attributable to official duties.”

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee for the following reasons: “I knee, knee, shoulder, bridge, etc. when I kneeeee, kneee, etc. when I am involved in the maintenance of construction equipment on January 1, 1995 after being appointed to Grade 9 to a civilian military employee in charge of the maintenance of construction equipment.” However, the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee appears to have been suffering from the disease of this case regardless of official duties, and due to the reasons alleged by the Plaintiff, the disease of this case occurred.

All existing diseases are natural progress.

arrow