1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 28, 1997, the Plaintiff was appointed as a police officer from around September 14, 1999, and served in B police station criminal and violent 2 teams. On August 1, 2000, the Plaintiff: (a) the police officer sent out after receiving a report from the drunk in a singing room on August 1, 200, and the police officer died of assault and death (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (b) the Defendant arrested the said suspect and investigated the sampling by August 2, 200 on the following day.

B. On June 13, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that “In the course of investigating the instant accident suspect with a high strength between the two pages, the Plaintiff continued the investigation into the Defendant as a fishing vessel by making it difficult for the Defendant to sit in, and making it difficult for him/her to sit, while making a serious investigation into the instant accident, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on October 27, 200 by C Hospital No. 3-4 (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”), and applied for the approval of medical care for the instant injury and disease on official duty.”

C. On July 1, 2016, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “In light of the Plaintiff’s performance of duties before and after the occurrence of the instant injury, it is difficult to recognize the instant injury as diseases due to the lack of external shock or obvious opportunity to the extent of the occurrence of the injury.” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

On the ground of the instant disposition, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee, but was dismissed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap's statements in Gap's 2 through 7, 14 through 18 (including virtual numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion is without sufficient rest from August 1, 200 to August 2, 2000 while he was assigned to B police station a strong duty, locking duty, overtime duty, etc.