1. The plaintiff's claim for retirement benefit payment changed in exchange at the trial is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remainder.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As such, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim for revocation of a restriction on retirement benefits in the instant lawsuit is unlawful, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim for payment of retirement benefits in exchange at the trial should be dismissed as it is without merit.

Therefore, the above claim for payment of retirement benefits is dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance on the claim for revocation of the above restriction on retirement benefits is just in conclusion, and the remaining appeal by the plaintiff is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.