1. Deposit amount of 100,000,000 won pursuant to the agreement dated October 24, 2012 among the instant lawsuit, the exchange of which was changed at the trial.

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the same with the exception of the following parts written or added:

(The main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). Of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, the "defendant" shall be replaced by "comprehensive construction of sexual friendship".

The following parts shall be added between seven pages of the first instance judgment and eight lines, and the 7th nine pages of the 7th "A" shall be added to "A No. 8" with "A. 8 and 9."

E. On December 24, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures for the so-called gender comprehensive construction, including commencement of rehabilitation procedures for the so-called gender comprehensive construction, as the Seoul Central District Court 2014 Gohap10184, and the Defendant was appointed as a custodian.

2. As such, the part of the claim for the confirmation of rehabilitation claim regarding KRW 100,000,000 as security deposit under the agreement dated October 24, 2012 and the down payment of KRW 100,00,000 according to the sales contract concluded on November 20, 2012 among the instant lawsuit in which the exchange was changed in the current trial is unlawful and dismissed, and the remainder of the Plaintiff’s claim that was changed in exchange in the current trial is dismissed.