logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.06.08 2017누3273
기타, 초지전용허가 등
Text

1. On January 27, 2012, the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the Minister of the Korea Forest Service for the change of exchange in the trial.

Reasons

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. The plaintiffs are annexed to the first instance court.

1. As stated in the previous purport of the claim, with regard to 39,878 square meters among 55,103 square meters of land in Yong-Gun, Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun, the following purport is to confirm or cancel that the disposition of permission to convert grassland was invalid on November 18, 2009 and the administrative vicarious execution on November 24, 2010, which was made by Defendant Young-gun, the head of Young-Gun, respectively, is to restore the said grassland to the former state, and to the original state. ② The Minister of the Korea Forest Service of Seo-gu, the Minister of Land, Transport and Do on December 22, 2010 confirms or cancels the transfer of ownership registration completed on February 21, 2012 due to the disposition of cancellation of the loan agreement and the cancellation of the loan agreement with the plaintiffs, and ③ the approval of the amendment of the D Industrial Complex development plan and the approval of the implementation plan and the development project on May 22, 2013 to the original state.

B. The court of first instance rendered a judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant Young-gun for revocation of the disposition of permission to divert grassland, the part of the claim for nullification of administrative vicarious execution and the part of the claim for revocation of cancellation, the part of the claim for revocation of approval of the development plan and the execution plan among the lawsuits against the defendant Young-gu Do Governor, the part of the claim for revocation of approval of the development plan and the part of the claim for cancellation of the execution plan, the part of the claim for restoration, and the plaintiffs' restoration. ④ The plaintiffs' remaining claims against the defendant Young-gu Gun and Jeonnam-do Do Governor (the claim for nullification of the permission to divert grassland against the defendant Young-gu Gun, the amendment of the development

C. On the judgment of the first instance court, only the Plaintiffs appealed and appealed, and the Plaintiffs modified the purport of the claim as stated in the current purport of the claim in the trial. The content of the original purport of the claim lies in the lawsuit against the Defendant Young-gun.

arrow