A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:30 on October 18, 2014, at the front of the Jeju East Police Station D box located in C, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Defendant’s lawful performance of duties and operation of crime prevention by setting up the door of the police box, and, (c) obstructed the Defendant’s lawful performance of duties and operation of the cell phone with the cell phone, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant by leaving the door of the police box in order to return to Korea; and (d) prevented the Defendant from working again; and (c) corrected the door of the police box in order to ensure that the said F would go back to Korea; (d) opened the door to return to Korea; (e) opened the door to return to Korea; and (e) opened the door to Korea; and (e) prevented the Defendant from working on the cell phone hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties and there is no basic area (6-1-4 months) (6-1-4 months) of the basic area (the special person) of the obstruction of performance of official duties and there is no criminal conviction (the decision of sentence), the reason for the crime, the reason for the suspended sentence, the fact that the victimized police officer does