logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.12 2016고정3899
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] The Defendant is a person who, in the Internet Social Network Service (SNS) Twitter (htp:/www. Twitter.com), has been engaged in activities under “C”’s separate name, “E”, and the victim F (WWW) has been engaged in activities under the name of “H” or “I”, which is the name of the son he raises in the said Twitter’s account, and sells a horse, etc. from the Internet J (NW) by using the patterns that is the name of the son he raises in the said Twitter.

From March 2015, the Defendant knew of the victim, entrusted or lent a translation of Japanese language to the victim from around March 2015. However, the Defendant filed a complaint against the victim as a fraud, filed a lawsuit against the victim, thereby making good appraisal.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 25, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Protection, etc. of Information and Communications Network (Defamation) around November 25, 2015: (a) accessed a twitter using a mobile phone, etc. at the Defendant’s residence, etc. located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City KK and 2 Dong 501; (b) referred to the victim for the purpose of slandering the victim; and (c) filed a complaint against the Defendant for the suspicion of fraud against the victim.

I The state of prohibition of departure is currently in several times and abroad by avoiding police investigation.

아무쪼록 돈은 빌려주지 마시길”, “ 나 아무래도 I 고소 당해 수배령 떨어졌으니 고두 러들 좀 데려 가라고 해야 쓰겄 다.” 라는 글을 게시하여, 피고인의 트위터 계정과 친구관계에 있는 불특정 다수의 사람들이 이를 볼 수 있도록 하였다.

However, there was no fact that the defendant filed a complaint against the victim, but there was no fact that the defendant had been a vessel or prohibition of departure against the victim.

After all, with the aim of slandering the victim, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through an information and communications network, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim.

2. On January 10, 2016, the Defendant’s insultd around January 10, 2016, K, Dong 2, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around January 10, 2016.

arrow