Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who uses the Internet social network services (SNS) Kakao Internet Account 'C' and 'D', and the victim E (n, 44 years old) is a person who uses the Account 'F'.

On September 2016, the Defendant: (a) connected the Defendant’s residence located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G to the account of “C” in the Kakakao Stoo by using a mobile phone; and (b) compared to those embezzled with the Defendant for the purpose of slandering the Victim while making comments on the Defendant’s non-fao bulletin in the account of “F” written by the Victim.

^^ 사람 가려 받으니까요', ' 유죄 내린 법원은 바보인가 봐요

Then, the author written comments on the comments of ‘C', ‘D' account without being subject to the judgment of embezzlement', ‘C', ‘I disregard the judgment issued by the court', so that many unspecified people in a relationship with the victim's account can be seen.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to data to file a complaint, notices, and to closure;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the relevant Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;